Acute and Critical Care

Original Article

Pulmonary
Effectiveness of online versus in-person structured training program on arterial blood gas, electrolytes, and ventilatory management of critically ill patients: Gaurav Jain, Bhavna Gupta, Priyanka Gupta, Sagarika Panda, Sameer Sharma, Shalinee Rao; Acute Crit Care. 2021;36(1):54-61. Published online February 2, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2020.00759

5,063 View
126 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Crossref

Background
Due to the risk of viral transmission during in-person training, a shift toward online platforms is imperative in the current pandemic. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness of an in-person interactive course with a structurally similar online course designed to improve cognitive skills among clinical health professionals in arterial blood gas analysis, management of electrolyte imbalances, and approaches to mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients.
Methods
In an observational, outcome assessor-blinded, cohort trial, group A included participants enrolled prospectively in an online course, while group B included those who took part in an in-person course (retrospective arm). The primary objective was comparison of cognitive skills through a pre and post-test questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using Student t-test.
Results
In total, 435 participants were analyzed in group A, while 99 participants were evaluated in group B. The mean pre-test score was 9.48±2.75 and 10.76±2.42, while the mean post-test score was 11.94±1.90 (passing rate, 64.6%) and 12.53±1.63 (passing rate, 73.3%) in groups A and B, respectively. Group B scored significantly higher in both pre-test (P=0.001) and post-test evaluations (P=0.004). The improvement in post-test score was significantly greater (P=0.001) in group A (2.46±2.22) compared to group B (1.77±1.76). The medical specialties fared better in group B, while surgical specialties scored higher in group A. The pre-test vs. post-test scores exhibited a moderate correlation in both groups (P<0.001). The feedback survey showed a Likert score >3.5 for most points in both groups.
Conclusions
The online teaching module exhibited a significant benefit in terms of participant sensitization and knowledge sharing.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Health Care Simulation as a Training Tool for Epidemic Management
Marcia A. Corvetto, Fernando R. Altermatt, Francisca Belmar, Eliana Escudero
Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.2023; 18(6): 382. CrossRef

Letter to the Editor

Rapid response system
Is the use of automated artificial manual breathing unit resuscitators justified during a pandemic mechanical ventilator crisis?: Kamna Kakkar, Bhavna Gupta; Acute Crit Care. 2020;35(3):220-222. Published online August 31, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2020.00311

11,400 View
182 Download
4 Web of Science
3 Crossref

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Recent advances in low-cost, portable automated resuscitator systems to fight COVID-19
Vishal Kumar, Ravinder Kumar, Mohit Kumar, Gurpreet Singh Wander, Vivek Gupta, Ashish Sahani
Health and Technology.2022; 12(1): 181. CrossRef
Design for the Automation of an AMBU Spur II Manual Respirator
Carles Domènech-Mestres, Elena Blanco-Romero, Albert de la Fuente-Morató, Manuel Ayala-Chauvin
Machines.2021; 9(2): 45. CrossRef
Data automated bag breathing unit for COVID-19 ventilator shortages
Aleksandra B. Gruslova, Nitesh Katta, Andrew G. Cabe, Scott F. Jenney, Jonathan W. Valvano, Tim B. Phillips, Austin B. McElroy, Robert K. LaSalle, Aydin Zahedivash, Van N. Truskett, Nishi Viswanathan, Marc D. Feldman, Richard B. Wettstein, Thomas E. Milne
Intensive Care Medicine Experimental.2021;[Epub] CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search