Background Adjunctive therapies, including high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) and bilevel positive airway pressure, have been explored to manage severe asthma attacks and avoid invasive ventilation. HFNC has gained interest as a potential alternative. This review evaluated and compared outcomes of HFNC with conventional oxygen therapy or other non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in severe asthma. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and gray literature identified studies published between August 25, 2014, and August 25, 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and results were presented in a forest plot. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (ROB-2) and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024558656). Results: Nine studies with 14,606 subjects were included. HFNC showed a trend toward improved pulmonary scores, though not statistically significant (P>0.05). Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission and need for escalation of support did not significantly differ from standard oxygen therapy or other NIV. HFNC was associated with a modest but significant increase in readmission (odds ratio, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.07–9.24; P=0.04). PICU length of stay was comparable across groups, and mortality among HFNC-treated patients remained <1%. Overall evidence quality was very low to low. Conclusions: HFNC did not demonstrate superior outcomes over conventional oxygen therapy and other NIV. Evidence remains limited and of low quality, highlighting the need for further high-quality studies.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Respiratory Support in Pediatric Critical and Near-Fatal Asthma: A Narrative Review Long Xiang, Herng Lee Tan, Andrew Miller, Alexandre T. Rotta, Jan Hau Lee Pulmonary Therapy.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Background Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a major adverse event commonly encountered in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) has long been used in the management of ARF, it has several adverse events which may cause patient discomfort and lead to treatment complication. Recently, high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has the potential to be an alternative for NIV in adults with ARF, including COVID-19 patients. The objective was to investigate the efficacy of HFNC compared to NIV in COVID-19 patients.
Methods This meta-analysis was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria. Literature search was carried out in electronic databases for relevant articles published prior to June 2021. The protocol used in this study has been registered in International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42020225186).
Results Although the success rate of NIV is higher compared to HFNC (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16–0.97; P=0.04), this study showed that the mortality in the NIV group is also significantly higher compared to HFNC group (OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.39–0.63; P<0.001). Moreover, this study also demonstrated that there was no significant difference in intubation rates between the two groups (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.86–2.11; P=0.19).
Conclusions Patients treated with HFNC showed better outcomes compared to NIV for ARF due to COVID-19. Therefore, HFNC should be considered prior to NIV in COVID-19–associated ARF. However, further studies with larger sample sizes are still needed to better elucidate the benefit of HFNC in COVID-19 patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19-related hypoxemic respiratory failure: a retrospective observational study Ahmed Saied Abdelmohsen, Mahmoud Mohamed Emam, Khaled M. Taema, Hossam Hosni Masoud, Soliman Belal The Egyptian Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Trends and management of acute respiratory failure in hospitalized patients: a multicenter retrospective study in South Korea Won Jin Yang, Yong Jun Choi, Kyung Soo Chung, Ji Soo Choi, Bo Mi Jung, Jae Hwa Cho Acute and Critical Care.2025; 40(2): 171. CrossRef
2023 Year in Review: High-Flow Nasal Cannula for COVID-19 Michael D Davis Respiratory Care.2024; 69(12): 1587. CrossRef
High-flow nasal cannula therapy in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units in a country with limited resources: a single-center experience Anh-Minh Vu Phan, Hai-Yen Thi Hoang, Thanh-Son Truong Do, Trung Quoc Hoang, Thuan Van Phan, Nguyet-Anh Phuong Huynh, Khoi Minh Le Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluating the use of the respiratory-rate oxygenation index as a predictor of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen failure in COVID-19 Scott Weerasuriya, Savvas Vlachos, Ahmed Bobo, Namitha Birur Jayaprabhu, Lauren Matthews, Adam R Blackstock, Victoria Metaxa Acute and Critical Care.2023; 38(1): 31. CrossRef
Does the variant positivity and negativity affect the clinical course in COVID-19?: A cohort study Erkan Yildirim, Levent Kilickan, Suleyman Hilmi Aksoy, Ramazan Gozukucuk, Hasan Huseyin Kilic, Yakup Tomak, Orhan Dalkilic, Ibrahim Halil Tanboga, Fevzi Duhan Berkan Kilickan Medicine.2023; 102(9): e33132. CrossRef
The COVID-19 Driving Force: How It Shaped the Evidence of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support Yorschua Jalil, Martina Ferioli, Martin Dres Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(10): 3486. CrossRef
Descriptive account of the first use of the LeVe CPAP System, a new frugal CPAP System, in adult patients with COVID-19 Pneumonitis in Uganda Anna Littlejohns, Helen Please, Racheal Musasizi, Stuart Murdoch, Gorret Nampiina, Ian Waters, William Davis Birch, Gregory de Boer, Nikil Kapur, Tumwesigye Ambrozi, Ninsiima Carol, Nakigudde Noel, Jiten Parmar, Peter Culmer, Tom Lawton, Edith Namulema Tropical Medicine and Health.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Mechanical ventilation and outcomes in COVID-19 patients admitted to intensive care unit in a low-resources setting: A retrospective study Sarakawabalo Assenouwe, Tabana Essohanam Mouzou, Ernest Ahounou, Lidaw Déassoua Bawe, Awèréou Kotosso, Koffi Atsu Aziagbe, Eyram Makafui Yoan Amekoudi, Mamoudou Omourou, Chimene Etonga Anoudem, Komi Séraphin Adjoh Journal of Acute Disease.2023; 12(5): 186. CrossRef
Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula and noninvasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yun Peng, Bing Dai, Hong-wen Zhao, Wei Wang, Jian Kang, Hai-jia Hou, Wei Tan Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Does High Flow Nasal Cannula avoid intubation and improve the mortality of adult patients in acute respiratory failure in the intensive care setting, when compared to others methods as Conventional Oxygen Therapy or Non-Invasive Ventilation? A narrative r P Fosseur, A Renard, P Mateu, J Rosman Acta Anaesthesiologica Belgica.2022; 73(Supplement): 97. CrossRef