Background The optimal goal of naloxone infusion in intensive care units is to ameliorate opioid-induced side effects in therapy or eliminate the symptoms of opioid toxicity in overdoses. Accurately monitoring and regulating the doses is critical to prevent adverse effects related to naloxone administration. The present study aimed to compare treatment outcomes when using two methods of intravenous naloxone infusion: an infusion pump or the standard method. Methods: This study involved 80 patients with signs and symptoms of opioid overdose. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups with respect to intravenous infusion of naloxone by either an infusion pump or the standard method. Results: Comparison of study parameters between the two groups at 12 and 24 hours after intervention showed significantly more compensatory acid-base imbalance in the naloxone infusion pump group. In the group that received naloxone by pump, only one patient experienced withdrawal symptoms, but withdrawal symptoms appeared in 12 patients (30.0%) in the standard intravenous infusion group within 12 hours and in seven additional patients (17.5%) within 24 hours of intervention. In the group receiving pump-based naloxone infusion therapy, no another complications were reported; however in the standard infusion group, the 12-hour and 24-hour complication rates were 55.0% and 32.5%, respectively. The length of hospital stay was 2.85±1.05 and 4.22±0.92 days for the pump and standard infusion groups, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusions: Naloxone infusion using an infusion pump may be safer with regard to hemodynamic stability, resulting in shorter hospitalization periods, and fewer posttreatment complications.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2020 Richard J. Bodnar Peptides.2022; 151: 170752. CrossRef
Are opioid receptor antagonists adequate for “Opioid” overdose in a changing reality? John F. Peppin, Joseph V. Pergolizzi, Albert Dahan, Robert B. Raffa Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics.2021; 46(4): 861. CrossRef
The Efficacy, Safety, and Convenience of a New Device for Flushing Intravenous Catheters (Baro Flush™): A Prospective Study Youn I. Choi, Jae Hee Cho, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Kwang An Kwon, Han Yong Chun, Dong Kyun Park, Yoon Jae Kim Medicina.2020; 56(8): 393. CrossRef
Background Although extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used for the treatment of acute high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), there are limited reports which focus on this approach. Herein, we described our experience with ECMO in patients with acute high-risk PE.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients diagnosed with acute highrisk PE and treated with ECMO between January 2014 and December 2018.
Results Among 16 patients included, median age was 51 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38 to 71 years) and six (37.5%) were male. Cardiac arrest was occurred in 12 (75.0%) including two cases of out-of-hospital arrest. All patients underwent veno-arterial ECMO and median ECMO duration was 1.5 days (IQR, 0.0 to 4.5 days). Systemic thrombolysis and surgical embolectomy were performed in seven (43.8%) and nine (56.3%) patients, respectively including three patients (18.8%) received both treatments. Overall 30-day mortality rate was 43.8% (95% confidence interval, 23.1% to 66.8%) and 30-day mortality rates according to the treatment groups were ECMO alone (33.3%, n=3), ECMO with thrombolysis (50.0%, n=4) and ECMO with embolectomy (44.4%, n=9).
Conclusions Despite the vigorous treatment efforts, patients with acute high-risk PE were related to substantial morbidity and mortality. We report our experience of ECMO as rescue therapy for refractory shock or cardiac arrest in patients with PE.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for refractory cardiac arrest: an overview of current practice and evidence Samir Ali, Christiaan L. Meuwese, Xavier J. R. Moors, Dirk W. Donker, Anina F. van de Koolwijk, Marcel C. G. van de Poll, Diederik Gommers, Dinis Dos Reis Miranda Netherlands Heart Journal.2024; 32(4): 148. CrossRef
Integration of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation into the Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: An Overview of Current Evidence Romain Chopard, Raquel Morillo, Nicolas Meneveau, David Jiménez Hämostaseologie.2024; 44(03): 182. CrossRef
Evidence-Based Management of Massive and Submassive Pulmonary Embolism Sara Al-Juboori, Tareq Alzaher, Hashem Al Omari, Sufyan Al Gammaz, Mazen Al-Qadi JAP Academy Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Mechanical Support in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Review Article Amer N. Kadri, Razan Alrawashdeh, Mohamad K. Soufi, Adam J. Elder, Zachary Elder, Tamam Mohamad, Eric Gnall, Mahir Elder Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2468. CrossRef
Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Evidence, Innovation, and Horizons Stanislav Henkin, Francisco Ujueta, Alyssa Sato, Gregory Piazza Current Cardiology Reports.2024; 26(11): 1249. CrossRef
Clinical characteristics and short-term outcomes of patients with critical acute pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: from the COMMAND VTE Registry-2 Kensuke Takabayashi, Yugo Yamashita, Takeshi Morimoto, Ryuki Chatani, Kazuhisa Kaneda, Yuji Nishimoto, Nobutaka Ikeda, Yohei Kobayashi, Satoshi Ikeda, Kitae Kim, Moriaki Inoko, Toru Takase, Shuhei Tsuji, Maki Oi, Takuma Takada, Kazunori Otsui, Jiro Sakamo Journal of Intensive Care.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for large pulmonary emboli Timothy J. George, Jenelle Sheasby, Rahul Sawhney, J. Michael DiMaio, Aasim Afzal, Dennis Gable, Sameh Sayfo Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings.2023; 36(3): 314. CrossRef
Surgical Management and Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolisms: Historical Context, Current Status, and Future Directions: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association Joshua B. Goldberg, Jay Giri, Taisei Kobayashi, Marc Ruel, Alexander J.C. Mittnacht, Belinda Rivera-Lebron, Abe DeAnda, John M. Moriarty, Thomas E. MacGillivray Circulation.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Life-threatening pulmonary embolism: overview and management Nizar Osmani, Jonathan Marinaro, Sundeep Guliani International Anesthesiology Clinics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jonathan Jia En Boey, Ujwal Dhundi, Ryan Ruiyang Ling, John Keong Chiew, Nicole Chui-Jiet Fong, Ying Chen, Lukas Hobohm, Priya Nair, Roberto Lorusso, Graeme MacLaren, Kollengode Ramanathan Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(1): 64. CrossRef
Pulmonary ECMO-ism: Let’s add PEA to ECPR indications Zachary Shinar, Alice Hutin Resuscitation.2022; 170: 293. CrossRef
Combined use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with interventional surgery for acute pancreatitis with pulmonary embolism: A case report Ling-Ling Yan, Xiu-Xiu Jin, Xiao-Dan Yan, Jin-Bang Peng, Zhuo-Ya Li, Bi-Li He World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(12): 3899. CrossRef
Pulmonary Embolism Complicated With Cardiopulmonary Arrest Treated With Combination of Thrombolytics and Aspiration Thrombectomy Taylor C. Remillard, Zain Kassam, Maks Coven, Aditya Mangla, Zoran Lasic JACC: Case Reports.2022; 4(10): 576. CrossRef
Anesthetic management for intraoperative acute pulmonary embolism during inferior vena cava tumor thrombus surgery: A case report Pei-Yu Hsu, En-Bo Wu World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(15): 5111. CrossRef
Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation: A case series Haytham Mously, Jamal Hajjari, Tarek Chami, Tarek Hammad, Robert Schilz, Teresa Carman, Yakov Elgudin, Yasir Abu‐Omar, Marc P. Pelletier, Mehdi H. Shishehbor, Jun Li Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions.2022; 100(2): 274. CrossRef
Clinical Experiences of High-Risk Pulmonary Thromboembolism Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Single Institution Joonyong Jang, So-My Koo, Ki-Up Kim, Yang-Ki Kim, Soo-taek Uh, Gae-Eil Jang, Wonho Chang, Bo Young Lee Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases.2022; 85(3): 249. CrossRef
Management of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: What Is the Place of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation? Benjamin Assouline, Marie Assouline-Reinmann, Raphaël Giraud, David Levy, Ouriel Saura, Karim Bendjelid, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(16): 4734. CrossRef
Optimal reperfusion strategy in acute high-risk pulmonary embolism requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support: a systematic review and meta-analysis Romain Chopard, Peter Nielsen, Fabio Ius, Serghei Cebotari, Fiona Ecarnot, Hugo Pilichowski, Matthieu Schmidt, Benedict Kjaergaard, Iago Sousa-Casasnovas, Mehrdad Ghoreishi, Rajeev L. Narayan, Su Nam Lee, Gregory Piazza, Nicolas Meneveau European Respiratory Journal.2022; 60(5): 2102977. CrossRef
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Series and Literature Review Zied Ltaief, Ermes Lupieri, Jean Bonnemain, Nawfel Ben-Hamouda, Valentina Rancati, Sabine Schmidt Kobbe, Matthias Kirsch, Jean-Daniel Chiche, Lucas Liaudet Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in high‐risk acute pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Luca Baldetti, Alessandro Beneduce, Lorenzo Cianfanelli, Giulio Falasconi, Luigi Pannone, Francesco Moroni, Angela Venuti, Stefania Sacchi, Mario Gramegna, Vittorio Pazzanese, Francesco Calvo, Guglielmo Gallone, Matteo Pagnesi, Alberto Maria Cappelletti Artificial Organs.2021; 45(6): 569. CrossRef
Institutional Experience With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Massive Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Case Series Maxwell A. Hockstein, Christina Creel-Bulos, Joshua Appelstein, Craig S. Jabaley, Michael J. Stentz Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia.2021; 35(9): 2681. CrossRef
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Massive Pulmonary Embolism-Related Cardiac Arrest: A Systematic Review* John Harwood Scott, Matthew Gordon, Robert Vender, Samantha Pettigrew, Parag Desai, Nathaniel Marchetti, Albert James Mamary, Joseph Panaro, Gary Cohen, Riyaz Bashir, Vladimir Lakhter, Stephanie Roth, Huaqing Zhao, Yoshiya Toyoda, Gerard Criner, Lisa Moor Critical Care Medicine.2021; 49(5): 760. CrossRef
Adult Langerhans histiocytosis with rare BRAF mutation complicated by massive pulmonary embolism Salma Hassan, Christina Fanola, Amy Beckman, Faqian Li, Andrew C. Nelson, Michael Linden, Joan D. Beckman Thrombosis Research.2020; 193: 207. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for high-risk pulmonary embolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis Matteo Pozzi, Augustin Metge, Anthony Martelin, Caroline Giroudon, Justine Lanier Demma, Catherine Koffel, William Fornier, Pascal Chiari, Jean Luc Fellahi, Jean Francois Obadia, Xavier Armoiry Vascular Medicine.2020; 25(5): 460. CrossRef
Evidence-Based Minireview: Advanced therapies and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for the management of high-risk pulmonary embolism Radhika Gangaraju, Frederikus A. Klok Hematology.2020; 2020(1): 195. CrossRef
Background This study aimed to present our 5-year experience of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) performed by emergency physicians.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed 58 patients who underwent ECPR between January 2010 and December 2014. The primary parameter analyzed was survival to hospital discharge. The secondary parameters analyzed were neurologic outcome at hospital discharge, cannulation time, and ECPR-related complications.
Results Thirty-one patients (53.4%) were successfully weaned from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 18 (31.0%) survived to hospital discharge. Twelve patients (20.7%) were discharged with good neurologic outcomes. The median cannulation time was 25.0 min (interquartile range 20.0-31.0 min). Nineteen patients (32.8%) had ECPR-related complications, the most frequent being distal limb ischemia. Regarding the initial presentation, 52 patients (83.9%) collapsed due to a cardiac etiology, and acute myocardial infarction (33/62, 53.2%) was the most common cause of cardiac arrest.
Conclusions The survival to hospital discharge rate for cardiac arrest patients who underwent ECPR conducted by an emergency physician was within the acceptable limits. The cannulation time and complications following ECPR were comparable to those found in previous studies.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation location, coronary angiography and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Yoonjic Kim, Jeong Ho Park, Sun Young Lee, Young Sun Ro, Ki Jeong Hong, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2023; 64: 142. CrossRef
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: time-dependent propensity score-sequential matching analysis from a nationwide population-based registry Yeongho Choi, Jeong Ho Park, Joo Jeong, Yu Jin Kim, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin Critical Care.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Time from arrest to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest Jeong Ho Park, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin, Young Sun Ro, Ki Jeong Hong Emergency Medicine Australasia.2019; 31(6): 1073. CrossRef
Pre-hospital extra-corporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation Ben Singer, Joshua C. Reynolds, David J. Lockey, Ben O’Brien Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.2018;[Epub] CrossRef