Background Intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform analysis provides critical insights into brain compliance and can aid in the early detection of neurological deterioration. Deep learning (DL) has recently emerged as an effective approach for analyzing complex medical signals and imaging data. The aim of the present research was to develop a DL-based model for detecting ICP waveforms indicative of poor brain compliance. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using ICP wave images collected from postoperative hydrocephalus (HCP) patients who underwent ventriculostomy. The images were categorized into normal and poor compliance waveforms. Precision, recall, mean average precision at the 0.5 intersection over union (mAP_0.5), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were used to test. Results: The dataset consisted of 2,744 ICP wave images from 21 HCP patients. The best-performing model achieved a precision of 0.97, a recall of 0.96, and a mAP_0.5 of 0.989. The confusion matrix for poor brain compliance waveform detection using the test dataset also demonstrated a high classification accuracy, with true positive and true negative rates of 48.5% and 47.8%, respectively. Additionally, the model demonstrated high accuracy, achieving a mAP_0.5 of 0.994, sensitivity of 0.956, specificity of 0.970, and an AUC of 0.96 in the detection of poor compliance waveforms. Conclusions: The DL-based model successfully detected pathological ICP waveforms, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making. As DL advances, its significance in neurocritical care will help to pave the way for more individualized and data-driven approaches to brain monitoring and management
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Perioperative Anesthetic Strategies in Emergent Neurosurgery During Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Denise Baloi, Clayton Rawson, Deondra Montgomery, Michael Karsy, Mehrdad Pahlevani Trauma Care.2026; 6(1): 5. CrossRef
Santiago Nicolás Saavedra, Patrick Valentino Sepúlveda Barisich, José Benito Parra Maldonado, Romina Belén Lumini, Alberto Gómez-González, Adrián Gallardo
Acute Crit Care. 2022;37(4):491-501. Published online November 30, 2022
Invasive mechanical ventilation is a frequent therapy in critically ill patients in critical care units. To achieve favorable outcomes, patient and ventilator interaction must be adequate. However, many clinical situations could attempt against this principle and generate a mismatch between these two actors. These asynchronies can lead the patient to worst outcomes; that is why it is vital to recognize and treat these entities as soon as possible. Early detection and recognition of the different asynchronies could favor the reduction of the days of mechanical ventilation, the days of hospital stay, and intensive care and improve clinical results.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
PVADet: fast patient-ventilator asynchrony detection on waveforms Longxiang Su, Yan Li, Yunping Lan, Qiang Sun, Fuhong Cai, Hongli He, Siyi Yuan, Song Zhang, Xianlong Liu, Elias Baedorf-Kassis, Xiaobo Huang, Yun Long Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.2026; 40(1): 113. CrossRef
Post-intensive Care Syndrome: Primer for the General Psychiatrist Emma R. Torncello, O. Joseph Bienvenu, George E. Sayde, Ewa D. Bieber, Jordan H. Rosen, Joseph D. Dragonetti Journal of Psychiatric Practice.2026; 32(1): 22. CrossRef
Ventilatory asynchronies induced by routine clinical practices in the intensive care unit: A systematic observation combined with a scoping review Andres Mauricio Enriquez Popayan, Henry Mauricio Parada- Gereda, Luis Alexander Peña-López Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Management and outcomes in women and men weaning from invasive mechanical ventilation: insights from the WEAN SAFE study Reginald Caldecott, Kate Laffey, Omid Khazaei, Yueyun Zhu, Bairbre A. McNicholas, Emanuele Rezoagli, Tài Pham, Leo Heunks, Giacomo Bellani, Laurent Brochard, Andrew J. Simpkin, Martin Dres, Paolo Navalesi, John G. Laffey Annals of Intensive Care.2026; 16: 100037. CrossRef
Does patient-ventilator asynchrony really matter? Mattia Docci, Antenor Rodrigues, Sebastian Dubo, Matthew Ko, Laurent Brochard Current Opinion in Critical Care.2025; 31(1): 21. CrossRef
Ability to identify patient-ventilator asynchronies in intensive care unit professionals: A multicenter cross-sectional analytical study Andrés Mauricio Enríquez Popayán, Iván Ignacio Ramírez, Juan Felipe Zúñiga, Ruvistay Gutierrez-Arias, Mayda Alejandra Jiménez Pérez, Henry Mauricio Parada-Gereda, Luis Fernando Pardo Cocuy, Ana Lucia Rangel Colmenares, Nubia Castro Chaparro, Ana Pinza Ort The Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2025; 11(2): 157. CrossRef
Advances in the Study of Patient Self-inflicted Lung Injury Guinan Sun, Jinjin Tian, Xueqin Zhang, Dandan Li International Journal of Biology and Life Sciences.2024; 7(1): 11. CrossRef
Patient Self-Inflicted Lung Injury—A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Early Recognition, and Management Options Peter Sklienka, Michal Frelich, Filip Burša Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(4): 593. CrossRef
Actualización sobre sedoanalgesia en paciente bajo ventilación mecánica Onan Emanuel Gregorio Revista de Postgrados de Medicina.2022; 1(1): 27. CrossRef