BACKGROUND Proper nutritional supplement is one of the fundamental management domains for critical ill patients.
While it shows positive effect on processing and prognosis of critical ill patients, early enteral nutrition is overlooked. This study explored healthcare professional's level of knowledge perception and performance on early enteral nutrition for critically ill patients. Data was collected from a convenient sample of 319 registered doctors, nurses and nutritionists in ICU at seven university hospitals. METHODS A cross-sectional survey design was used. The participants were assessed by questionnaires, specifically designed for the study and verified for the content validity by professional reviewers related with critical ill patients. RESULTS While the level of the perception of early enteral nutrition is high, the level of knowledge and performance are relatively low. The nurses showed a statistically significant difference on the level of knowledge, by their educational backgrounds and clinical experiences. Regarding the hospital support system, the doctors showed a significant difference on the level of perception and performance, while the nurses only showed that difference on the level of performance. It was shown that with higher the level of knowledge regarding the early enteral nutrition, the higher the level of performance. Further, the higher the level of perception, the higher the level of performance was observed. The hospital support system and the perception of the healthcare professionals are two most influential factors to affect the performance of the healthcare professionals related with the early enteral nutrition for the critically ill patients. CONCLUSION To perform the proper early enteral nutrition, the hospital support system and the level of the healthcare professionals' perception, are two most important factors.
Therefore, the efforts to build the hospital support system along with the educational provisions are needed.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effects of a video-based enteral nutrition education program using QR codes for intensive care unit nurses: a quasi-experimental study Won Kee Seo, Hyunjung Kim Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science.2024; 26(1): 16. CrossRef
Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Enteral Nutrition: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study Khaled Mohammed Al-Sayaghi, Talal Ali Hussein Saad Alqalah, Sameer Abdulmalik Alkubati, Gamil Ghaleb Alrubaiee, Sultan Abdulwadoud Alshoabi, Masouda Hassan Atrous, Farida Khalil Ibrahim Mohamed, Kamal Dahan Alsultan, Awadia Greeballah Suliman, Moawia Bush The Open Nursing Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Influencing the Occurrence of Diarrhea in Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units Hanna Lee, Rhayun Song Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2019; 26(4): 221. CrossRef
Critical Care Nurses’ Perception, Knowledge, and Practices of Enteral Nutrition Hyunjung Kim, Eunjin Soun Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing.2016; 23(4): 383. CrossRef
Nutritional Assessment of ICU Inpatients with Tube Feeding Yu-Jin Kim, Jung-Sook Seo Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association.2015; 21(1): 11. CrossRef
Nutritional Support, Gastric Residual Volume and Nutritional Status during Enteral Nutrition in Intensive Care Unit Patients Minju Lee, Jiyeon Kang Korean Journal of Adult Nursing.2014; 26(6): 621. CrossRef
BACKGROUND The assessment tools for leadership and performance of resuscitation teams are have not been developed. We evaluated the checklists for resuscitation team performance and teamwork. METHODS We developed two checklists for team dynamics (D1, D2) and two checklists for team performances (P1, P2). The videotaped mock resuscitation before and after a 2-hr Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) training were also evaluated by two emergency physicians and two nurses using the four checklists. The validity and agreement between assessors were determined. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach-alpha. RESULTS There were no significant differences in scores by expert consensus and the checklist score. The average scores between different assessors were different except for the D1 and D2 between doctors. The Cronbach-alpha for internal consistency were within acceptable ranges in the checklists D2 and P2. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the D2 and P2 checklists are provisionally acceptable due to relatively high validity, agreement, and internal consistency. However, further research is needed to develop validated checklists for resuscitation teams.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effects of communication team training on clinical competence in Korean Advanced Life Support: A randomized controlled trial Soyeon Yun, Hyeoun‐Ae Park, Sang‐Hoon Na, Hee Je Yun Nursing & Health Sciences.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Focused and Corrective Feedback Versus Structured and Supported Debriefing in a Simulation-Based Cardiac Arrest Team Training Ji-Hoon Kim, Young-Min Kim, Seong Heui Park, Eun A Ju, Se Min Choi, Tai Yong Hong Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare.2017; 12(3): 157. CrossRef
Nurses' Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Performance during the First 5 minutes in In-Situ Simulated Cardiac Arrest Eun Jung Kim, Kyeong Ryong Lee, Myung Hyun Lee, Jiyoung Kim Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2012; 42(3): 361. CrossRef
Assessment and Training of Teamwork and Leadership for Critical Care Nurses: A Pilot Study Hyun Jin Kim, Sang Mo Je, Hyun Soo Chung, Sung Phil Chung, Hahn Shick Lee Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine.2012; 27(2): 75. CrossRef