Complications of Central Venous Totally Implantable Access Port: Internal Jugular Versus Subclavian Access
The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2015;30(1):13-17 
Complications of Central Venous Totally Implantable Access Port: Internal Jugular Versus Subclavian Access
The Korean Journal of Critical Care Medicine. 2015;30(4):365-365
Long-term complications in totally implantable venous access devices: Randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein puncture
Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2011;58(2):274-277
Reply to Letter to the Editor re: “Radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port: observations about right internal jugular access”
European Radiology. 2011;21(10):2168-2168
Late complications associated with totally implantable venous access port implantation via the internal jugular vein
Supportive Care in Cancer. 2019;28(6):2761-2768
Modification of approach for totally implantable venous access device decreases rate of complications
Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2009;100(3):279-283
Letter to the Editor re “Outcome analysis in 3160 implantations of radiologically guided placements of totally implantable central venous port systems”: observations about right internal jugular access.
European Radiology. 2011;21(10):2166-2167
Safety and Feasibility of the Venous Access via Internal Jugular Vein Puncture Approach for Totally Implantable Venous Access Device Placements Compared with Subclavian Vein Puncture
Journal of Cancer Therapy. 2013;04(01):161-164
Internal jugular vein versus subclavian vein as the percutaneous insertion site for totally implantable venous access devices: a meta-analysis of comparative studies
BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):
Totally implantable venous access ports: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures
Phlebology: The Journal of Venous Disease. 2022;37(4):279-288