Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Articles

Page Path
HOME > Acute Crit Care > Volume 39(2); 2024 > Article
Original Article
Nursing
Sleep, anxiety, depression, and stress in critically ill patients: a descriptive study in a Portuguese intensive care unit
Rui Domingues Silva1orcid, Abílio Cardoso Teixeira2,3orcid, José António Pinho1,2, Pedro Marcos1, José Carlos Santos4,5orcid
Acute and Critical Care 2024;39(2):312-320.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2023.01256
Published online: May 30, 2024

1Departamento de Anestesiologia, Cuidados Intensivos e Emergência,Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal

2Escola Superior de Saúde de Santa Maria, Porto, Portugal

3CINTESIS - Centro de Investigação em Tecnologias e Serviços de Saúde, Porto, Portugal

4Escola Superior de Enfermagem de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

5CIDNUR - Centro de Investigação, Inovação e Desenvolvimento em Enfermagem de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

Corresponding author: Abílio Cardoso Teixeira Escola Superior de Saúde de Santa Maria, Tv. by Antero de Quental 173 175, 4049-024 Porto, Portugal Tel: +351-22-509-8664 E-mail: abilio.teixeira@santamariasaude.pt
• Received: September 26, 2023   • Revised: March 2, 2024   • Accepted: April 5, 2024

© 2024 The Korean Society of Critical Care Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 544 Views
  • 88 Download
  • Background
    Sleep disorders are common among patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs). This study aimed to assess the perceptions of sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and stress reported by ICU patients and the relationships between these perceptions and patient variables.
  • Methods
    This cross-sectional study used consecutive non-probabilistic sampling to select participants. All patients admitted for more than 72 hours of ICU hospitalization at a Portuguese hospital between March and June 2020 were asked to complete the “Richard Campbell Sleep Questionnaire” and “Anxiety, depression, and Stress Assessment Questionnaire.” The resulting data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Student t-tests for independent samples, and analysis of variance. The significance level for rejecting the null hypothesis was set to α ≤0.05.
  • Results
    A total of 52 patients admitted to the ICU for at least 72 hours was recruited. The mean age of the participants was 64 years (standard deviation, 14.6); 32 (61.5%) of the participants were male. Approximately 19% had psychiatric disorders. The prevalence of self-reported poor sleep was higher in women (t[50]=2,147, P=0.037) and in participants with psychiatric problems, although this difference was not statistically significant (t[50]=–0.777, P=0.441). Those who reported having sleep disorders before hospitalization had a worse perception of their sleep.
  • Conclusions
    Sleep quality perception was worse in female ICU patients, those with psychiatric disorders, and those with sleep alterations before hospitalization. Implementing early interventions and designing nonpharmacological techniques to improve sleep quality of ICU patients is essential.
In the intensive care unit (ICU), nurses must continuously assess vital signs, implement and evaluate treatment plans, administer medications, and anticipate and prevent adverse patient outcomes [1]. However, the methods required to care for these patients may limit family participation in decision making, and the patients’ psychosocial needs may be neglected [2]. Previous reports have indicated a link between sleep disturbance in critical-care patients and increased incidences of delirium, mortality rates, and hospital stay [3]. Additionally, sleep disturbances have been shown to be associated with short-term symptoms like lethargy, fatigue, irritability, confusion, memory issues, and loss of muscle, which may hinder the recovery process and potentially impact the patient's quality of life in the longer term [4-7].
Sleep deprivation is a common issue faced by patients during hospitalization and ICU care and may be attributed to several factors. The ICU environment may contribute to sleep disruption due to the noise and light and the need for patient care activities, diagnostic procedures, and mechanical ventilation. Sleep quality while in hospital may also be a function of factors related to the patient's health, such as pre-existing sleep disorders, severity and/or acute onset of illness, organ dysfunction, and pain; these factors may also increase stress and anxiety [7,8], which may further disrupt sleep and induce additional stress and anxiety [8].
As sleep disturbance is considered a risk factor for anxiety [9-11], complaints of sleep disturbances are generally regarded as diagnostic criteria for anxiety disorders [12,13]. Furthermore, depression, anxiety, and stress are common in patients who have suffered traumatic brain injury and should be anticipated in critically ill patients [14].
Sleep disturbances among ICU patients are well known but are not currently addressed in a consistent manner. Indeed, in recent years, various strategies have been implemented to promote and improve sleep. However, hospitalized patients often cannot achieve good-quality sleep [15]. Due to the tremendous impact of sleep disturbance on healthcare services, it is crucial to identify patients at higher risk of sleep and mental health disorders after hospitalization to prevent rather than react to possible adverse patient outcomes. Thus, this study aimed to describe and predict the quality of sleep of critically ill patients and to predict possible correlations of sleep disturbances with anxiety, depression, and stress.
This single-center, cross-sectional, and correlational study analyzed adult patients admitted to a Portuguese ICU between March and June 2020. The hospital's Ethics Committee approved the study (authorization 2020.053, 043-DEFI/045-CE). Informed consent was obtained from all participants after providing them with all necessary information.
The data collection instruments included sociodemographic and clinical characterization and the “Richard Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ)” and “Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21 (DASS-21).” The RCSQ is frequently used to assess sleep quality in ICU patients, and many clinical practice guidelines recommend its use [16]. This instrument includes six items (sleep depth, falling asleep, awakenings, return to sleep, sleep quality, and an additional item addressing noise levels) and uses a visual analog scale. The score for each item ranges from 0 (indicating the worst possible sleep) to 100 (indicating the best sleep). A total sleep score is obtained for each patient by summing the individual scores on the five sleep items and dividing the result by five (to obtain a final RCSQ score of 0 to 100). Those within the lowest quartile (scores from 0 to 25) are considered to have the worst sleep, and those within the highest quartile (76 to 100) are deemed to have excellent sleep.
The DASS-21 [17] consists of 42 items evenly distributed across depression, anxiety, and stress subscales [18]. Each scale comprises seven items, each of which is scored with a four-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 3 ("strongly agree"). The final result is obtained by summing the scores of the items in each subscale. The cutoff points, indicative of severity, are described in Table 1. This instrument has strong evidence for its validity in various areas including bifactor structural, internal consistency, criterion, and construct validity [19]. The DASS-21 is a high-quality tool used to assess emotional states, although it has inherent limitations with respect to assessing the individual severities of depression, anxiety, and stress [20]. However, given the reliability, validity, and ease of use, the DASS is considered a useful tool for research and clinical settings [21].
Population and Sample
In a consecutive non-probabilistic sampling process, all patients admitted to the ICU who met the following inclusion criteria completed the data collection process: ICU stay longer than 72 hours and able to complete the questionnaire themselves or indicate their answer to the researcher. All patients younger than 18 years, with an ICU stay less than 72 hours, who experienced confusional states (all psychic and autopsychic disorientation states, including delirium), or had been prescribed medication that alters sleep patterns (e.g., sedatives, anxiolytics, and/or analgesics) were excluded.
Data Collection
Firstly, the study's objective and methods were presented to the nursing team. Prior to obtaining informed consent of the participants, the patients who met the inclusion criteria were provided the study objectives and a description of the study design and were asked for their free and informed participation. The principal researcher provided all the necessary information to participants and the authorization to be signed; permission was obtained through a fingerprint (preferably from the index finger of the dominant hand) for those who could not sign. The participants were invited to complete the data collection instruments autonomously. Whenever the patient demonstrated incapacity or a preference for assistance, the researcher filled out the questionnaires according to the indications/answers of the user and revalidated them.
Statistical Analysis
The patients’ sociodemographic data were first described using measures of central tendency and dispersion for quantitative variables and absolute and relative frequencies for qualitative variables. The outcomes, including dimensions and total scale, were described using the mean and standard deviation (SD). In all analyses, significance was assessed using an alpha of 0.05. Cronbach's alpha coefficient (a measure of internal consistency), Pearson's correlation coefficient, Student t-test for independent samples, and the multivariate analysis of variance (ANOVA) test were used for analysis. The normality of the data distributions was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and the homogeneity of the variance was analyzed using the Levene test. All data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS version 27.0 (IBM Corp.).
Fifty-two participants completed the survey during the study period (Table 2). The mean age was 64±14.6 years (range, 20–84 years); 32 (61.5%) were men, and 32 were married (62.7%). The median length of stay was 6±3.64 days (range, 3–290 days). About 19% of participants had a history of psychiatric illness.
There were various reasons for ICU admission (Table 3), ranging from gastrointestinal impairment (27.0% of patients) to nervous system impairment (1.9%). The reliability of the questionnaire scales was estimated using Cronbach's alpha coefficient: there was variation observed among the scores of the diverse dimensions between 0.647 (weak but acceptable) to 0.871 (good) [22] and is presented in Table 4.
The correlations between anxiety, depression, stress, and sleep quality were statistically significant, positive, and moderate (Table 5). Thus, the higher were the values of anxiety, depression, and stress, the worse was the perception of sleep quality.
With this study, we aimed to test the following hypotheses: H1: women have a worse perception of sleep than men; H2: patients with psychiatric problems have a worse perception of sleep; H3: patients with sleep disorders before hospitalization have worse sleep perception; H4: patients who have experienced sleep disorders in the past may exhibit changes in stress, depression, and anxiety; H5: patients with a history of any reported psychiatric illness may exhibit changes in stress, depression, and anxiety; Regarding H1, the ICU patients’ perception of their sleep quality was significantly worse in women than in men (t(50)=2.147, P=0.037) (Table 6).
Regarding H2, the ICU patients’ perception of their sleep quality was worse in those with psychiatric problems (Table 7), although the difference was not significant (t(50)=–0.777, P=0.441). Regarding H3, the ICU patients’ perception of their sleep quality was worse in those who reported sleep disturbances prior to hospitalization (Table 7), although the difference was not statistically significant (t(50)=1.831, P=0.073).
Regarding H4, the multivariate ANOVA results indicated that differences in reported stress, depression, or anxiety among the patients who have experienced sleep disorders in the past were not significant (Λ=0.904, F(3.48)=1.708, P=0.178) (Table 8). Regarding H5, a significant positive correlation was found between reported stress, depression, or anxiety and psychiatric history (Table 9). The ICU patients with a history of psychiatric illness more frequently reported more severe depression (7.50 vs. 3.26) and stress (9.50 vs. 5.80).
In the ICU, numerous stimuli can interfere with the quality of sleep and, consequently, with the outcomes of hospitalized patients [23]. For various reasons, stimuli such as noise are increased in the ICU. On the other hand, beneficial stimuli such as natural light are limited [23,24]. Sleep is an essential biological function and is considered fundamental for good health and quality of life. Sleep quality modulates many body functions, including immune system function, removal of cellular toxins, and control of body temperature, blood pressure, pulse, and hormone production [4,25].
Many ICU patients experience sleep disorders of varying severity related to both intrinsic and extrinsic factors. The ICU staff have an important role in reducing the extrinsic factors that impact sleep quality in the ICU to minimize adverse events. In this study, we assessed the sleep quality of ICU patients and investigated associations between some intrinsic factors and sleep quality in the ICU. The results may allow early identification of ICU patients at higher risk of sleep disturbances during their hospital stay.
The average age of the study participants was 64 years, which is slightly higher than in previous studies [20] but within the reported range. As expected, the participants' sleep quality during hospitalization was reported to be poorer, as age and sleep quality are highly negatively correlated. Although the questionnaire responses indicated that 59.6% of the study participants reported previous sleep disturbances, 80% of the patients also reported use of prescription medications prior to hospitalization, and 77.1% continued to receive their medication during hospitalization.
Critical illness can cause physiological and emotional disorders that can negatively impact sleep quality, regardless of the reason for hospitalization. According to the findings of this study, the participants' mean perception of their sleep quality is below 50%, which could indicate significant changes in sleep patterns, similar to the findings of other studies [7,24]. However, the perception of sleep quality by the participants, given the average length of stay of six days, with a range of 3 to 290 days, may have been related to extrinsic factors not evaluated in this study, including environment, noise, luminosity, and temperature [7,26,27].
Most ICU patients rate their sleep quality as low [7,24], corroborating the data of this investigation. Low-quality sleep is characterized by a high proportion of stages 1 and 2, fragmented sleep, with circadian rhythm changes; stage 3 and REM sleep may be significantly decreased or absent [28-32]. Reduced sleep quality may increase the length of hospitalization by delaying weaning from ventilation support [33] and increasing the incidence of delirium and, consequently, adverse outcomes [34,35]. Longer length of stay and a weakened immune system due to lack of quality sleep increase the risk of healthcare-associated infection [34,36].
Methods to promote better sleep can include medications, such as benzodiazepines, which may result in changes to cognitive function, increased risk of tolerance and dependence, ventilatory impairment, and adverse effects on sleep patterns [37]. Alternatively, non-pharmacological approaches may be employed, including mental or behavioral interventions, breathing exercises, music therapy, aromatherapy, massage, guided imagery, acupuncture, environmental changes (e.g., synchronization of ICU activities with daylight, noise reduction], social support (e.g., family assistance), and equipment modification [4,24].
However, the use of such strategies may not influence the patient’s anxiety and stress and so not improve sleep [9]. The ICU patient typically has abnormally high levels of anxiety and depression [38]. In the present study, the participants’ self-reported scores were consistent with moderate depression and stress and mild anxiety, perhaps because the sample demonstrated variability in disease severity and most had short hospital stays. The patient hospitalized in the ICU is subject to numerous stress factors, the most prevalent of which are being thirsty, having invasive devices in the nose and mouth, not being able to communicate, decreased mobility due to invasive and non-invasive devices, not being able to sleep, and loss of autonomy [39]. The data from this study are consistent with the above-noted stressors: the higher were the self-reported scores for anxiety, stress, and depression, the worse was the perception of sleep.
Some studies have reported that sleep duration and quality changes are associated with increased incidence of mental health disorders, including depression and anxiety [40]. Conversely, no relationship between previous sleep alterations and stress, depression, or anxiety was found in this study, and there may be other predictive factors of greater importance.
Previous studies have reported that people with mental health issues were much more likely to have a shorter sleep duration and quality [40], as in the present study, in which the perception of sleep quality was worse in ICU patients with psychiatric illnesses. In this study, 80% of the participants patient had no history of mental illness. We also discovered that participants with a history of mental illness had significantly higher scores for self-reported depression and stress, consistent with previous findings [41,42], including those from studies of patients with traumatic brain injury [43], stroke patient [42] oncological disease [44,45], or cardiovascular disease [46-48] and of pregnant [49,50] or postpartum [49,51] women.
In the present study, the perception of sleep was worse in the female participants. A study of healthy adults in Canada found that 55% of women report problems falling asleep, which is higher than men. [52]. In contrast, another study of healthy participants found that women had a significantly longer sleep duration, a lower percentage of stage 1 sleep, and a higher percentage of slow-wave sleep compared to men [53].
Sleep disorders increase the risk of delirium, extend hospital stays, and are associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. However, evidence-based practices are necessary to manage and improve sleep quality of hospital patients. There is a need to educate hospital nurses about the impact of sleep quality on patient outcomes to better enable them to assess overall condition and to implement appropriate measures to encourage sleep and minimize unfavorable outcomes.
A patient’s healthcare plan should include measures to manage sleep quality during hospitalization and strategies to manage sleep disorders and mitigate adverse effects when they occur. By being proactive in these areas, healthcare professionals can better support patients and promote positive outcomes.
There is a need for ICU nurses to employ high-quality, validated tools to monitor and evaluate the sleep quality of their patients and evidence-based strategies to achieve desired results. However, implementing evidence-based methods to assess sleep quality in clinical practice remains a challenge, as does improving the understanding of sleep and sleep disorders among medical staff caring for hospitalized patients. There are several obstacles to promoting sleep in the ICU, including the major trend of reducing sedation for critical patients.
It is essential to exercise caution when interpreting this study's results, as several limitations were involved. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused disruptions during the first wave, leading to a reformulation of services and a subsequent reduction in the number of participants. The deteriorating epidemiological situation also necessitated reorganization of the data collection process, further limiting the number of participants.
It is important to consider external variables that may influence an individual's perception of sleep, such as noise, luminosity, and nursing activities. The use of self-reporting instruments, while helpful, may not provide a complete picture of an individual's sleep experience. The assessment of sleep quality is a multidimensional function that includes factors such as total sleep time, awakening, expectations, global perception, nocturnal awakenings, tiredness after waking, day-to-day energy, and other factors. As a result, various tools may be needed to assess different dimensions of sleep. 
Further research addressing the quality of sleep among ICU patients is needed. Many aspects of this field have not been adequately studied, including the influence of invasive ventilation and ventilatory modes on a patient's sleep or the impact of inotropic or cardiovascular-active drugs on sleep deprivation. Additional multicenter studies to test interventions and strategies to promote sleep and to minimize alterations of sleep-wake patterns in the ICU, taking into account factors such as disease severity, age, medications, and length of stay, are needed.
When patients are admitted to the ICU, the primary aim of healthcare professionals is to save their lives. However, some life-saving interventions can lead to adverse events and other adverse consequences in the short and medium term, including disruption of sleep. To address this issue, healthcare providers should identify factors that may disturb their patients' sleep and develop intervention plans based on evidence-based strategies.
To improve our understanding of the importance of sleep in ICU patients, we suggest using the scales outlined in this study as a routine practice. Additionally, healthcare providers should receive training on promoting sleep and evaluating its quality.
Data regarding the sleep quality of patents in the ICUs of Portuguese hospitals are limited, and this study provides new insight in this area. The findings support additional exploration of appropriate and practical tools to monitor and to evaluate the quality of sleep in critically ill patients.
▪ We suggest routine implementation of sleep quality assessment in intensive care unit patients, including the scales used in this study.
▪ It is essential to identify factors that may lead to sleep disturbance in critically ill patients.
▪ Therapeutics should be directed at all potential sleep-disturbing factors, optimizing the diurnal and nocturnal environment, and minimizing unnecessary sleep interruptions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

FUNDING

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization: RDS, ACT, JCS. Methodology: RDS, JCS. Formal analysis: RDS, ACT, JCS. Investigation: RDS, JCS. Visualization: JAP, PM. Writing–Original draft preparation: RDS. Writing–Review and editing: ACT.

None.
Table 1.
DASS-21 severety score
Variable Percentile Depression Anxiety Stress
Normal 0–78 0–4 0–3 0–7
Mild 78–87 5–6 4–5 8–9
Moderate 87–95 7–10 6–7 10–12
Severe 95–98 11–13 8–9 13–16
Extremely severe 98–100 >14 >10 >17

DASS-21: Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21.

Table 2.
Sociodemographic and clinical characterization (n=52)
Variable Value
Age (yr) 64±15
Sex
 Female 20 (38.5)
 Mele 32 (61.5)
Marital status
 Single 8 (15.7)
 Married 32 (62.7)
 Divorced 5 (9.8)
 Widowed 6 (11.8)
Length of stay in ICU (day) 6.0±3.6
Psychiatric history
 No 42 (80.8)
 Yes 10 (19.2)
Sleep disturbances (before ICU)
 No 21 (40.4)
 Yes 31 (59.6)
Sleep medication (before ICU)
 No 10 (19.6)
 Yes
Sleep medication (during ICU stay) 41 (80.4)
 No 11 (22.9)
 Yes 37 (77.1)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

ICU: intensive care unit.

Table 3.
Reason for ICU admission (n=52)
Reason for ICU admission No. (%)
Gastrointestinal 14 (26.9)
Sepsis 10 (19.2)
Vascular 9 (17.3)
Cardiovascular 5 (9.6)
Multiple trauma 4 (7.7)
Respiratory 3 (5.8)
Endocrine 2 (3.9)
Orthopedic 2 (3.9)
Renal 2 (3.9)
Neurological 1 (1.9)

ICU: intensive care unit.

Table 4.
Scale reliability
Scale α Of the dimension Number of items
RCSQ 0.837 6
DASS-21
 Depression 0.871 7
 Anxiety 0.647 7
 Stress 0.756 7

RCSQ: Richard Campbell Sleep Questionnaire; DASS-21: Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale 21.

Table 5.
Correlations between anxiety, depression, anxiety, and stress and sleep
Scale Depression Anxiety Stress
Depression - - -
Anxiety 0.626 - -
Stress 0.682 0.608 -
RCSQ total 0.452 0.355 0.324

RCSQ: Richard Campbell Sleep Questionnaire.

Table 6.
Relationship between sex and sleep quality
Female Male P-value
Sleep quality 5.2±2.3 3.8±2.1 0.037

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 7.
Relationship between psychiatric history and sleep quality and sleep quality in ICU
Psychiatric history
P-value
Yes No
Sleep quality 4.8±3.0 4.2±2.1 0.441
Sleep quality in ICU 5.0±2.4 3.9±2.1 0.073

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

ICU: intensive care unit.

Table 8.
Relationship between depression, anxiety, and stress and previous sleep changes
Previous sleep change
P-value
Yes No
Depression 3.95±4.56 4.6±4.70 0.874
Anxiety 5.95±4.11 4.35±2.96 0.110
Stress 6.61±4.66 6.45±3.32 0.880

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.

Table 9.
Relationship between depression, anxiety and stress and psychiatric history
Psychiatric history P-value
Yes No
Depression 7.50±5.06 3.26±4.14 0.008
Anxiety 6.30±4.90 4.69±3.11 0.197
Stress 9.50±4.67 5.80±3.35 0.006

Values are presened as mean±standard deviation.

  • 1. Teixeira AC, Vieira F. O Perfil do enfermeiro numa unidade de cuidados intensivos. In: Pinho JA. In: Enfermagem em cuidados intensivos. 1st ed. LIDEL. 2020, pp 21-4.
  • 2. Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, Shepard E, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004-2005. Crit Care Med 2007;35:605-22.ArticlePubMed
  • 3. Brito RA, do Nascimento Rebouças Viana SM, Beltrão BA, de Araújo Magalhães CB, de Bruin VM, de Bruin PF. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to promote sleep in intensive care units: a critical review. Sleep Breath 2020;24:25-35.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 4. Pulak LM, Jensen L. Sleep in the intensive care unit: a review. J Intensive Care Med 2016;31:14-23.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 5. Beltrami FG, Nguyen XL, Pichereau C, Maury E, Fleury B, Fagondes S. Sleep in the intensive care unit. J Bras Pneumol 2015;41:539-46.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 6. Elías MN, Munro CL, Liang Z, Calero K, Ji M. Sleep and intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill older adults. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2019;38:20-8.ArticlePubMed
  • 7. Medrzycka-Dabrowska W, Lewandowska K, Kwiecień-Jaguś K, Czyż-Szypenbajl K. Sleep deprivation in intensive care unit: systematic review. Open Med (Wars) 2018;13:384-93.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 8. Kamdar BB, Knauert MP, Jones SF, Parsons EC, Parthasarathy S, Pisani MA, et al. Perceptions and practices regarding sleep in the intensive care unit: a survey of 1,223 critical care providers. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016;13:1370-7.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 9. Papadimitriou GN, Linkowski P. Sleep disturbance in anxiety disorders. Int Rev Psychiatry 2005;17:229-36.ArticlePubMed
  • 10. Mellman TA. Sleep and anxiety disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2006;29:1047-58.ArticlePubMed
  • 11. Martín-Merino E, Ruigómez A, Wallander MA, Johansson S, García-Rodríguez LA. Prevalence, incidence, morbidity and treatment patterns in a cohort of patients diagnosed with anxiety in UK primary care. Fam Pract 2010;27:9-16.ArticlePubMed
  • 12. Pires GN, Bezerra AG, Tufik S, Andersen ML. Effects of acute sleep deprivation on state anxiety levels: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med 2016;24:109-18.ArticlePubMed
  • 13. Belleville G, Cousineau H, Levrier K, St-Pierre-Delorme ME, Marchand A. The impact of cognitive-behavior therapy for anxiety disorders on concomitant sleep disturbances: a meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord 2010;24:379-86.ArticlePubMed
  • 14. Wiseman TA, Curtis K, Lam M, Foster K. Incidence of depression, anxiety and stress following traumatic injury: a longitudinal study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2015;23:29. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 15. Menear A, Elliott R, M Aitken L, Lal S, McKinley S. Repeated sleep-quality assessment and use of sleep-promoting interventions in ICU. Nurs Crit Care 2017;22:348-54.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 16. Devlin JW, Skrobik Y, Gélinas C, Needham DM, Slooter AJ, Pandharipande PP, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med 2018;46:e825-73.PubMed
  • 17. Pais-Ribeiro JL, Honrado A, Leal I. Contribuição para o estudo da adaptação portuguesa das Escalas de Ansiedade, Depressão e Stress (EADS) de 21 itens de Lovibond e Lovibond. Psicologia Saúde Doenças 2004;5:229-39.
  • 18. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther 1995;33:335-43.ArticlePubMed
  • 19. Lee J, Lee EH, Moon SH. Systematic review of the measurement properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 by applying updated COSMIN methodology. Qual Life Res 2019;28:2325-39.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 20. Apóstolo JL, Mendes AC, Azeredo ZA. Adaptation to Portuguese of the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS). Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 2006;14:863-71.ArticlePubMed
  • 21. Pezirkianidis C, Karakasidou E, Lakioti A, Stalikas A, Galanakis M. Psychometric properties of the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a Greek sample. Psychology 2018;9:2933-50.ArticlePDF
  • 22. Taber KS. The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Res Sci Educ 748:1273-96.ArticlePDF
  • 23. Harrison Y, Horne JA. The impact of sleep deprivation on decision making: a review. J Exp Psychol Appl 2000;6:236-49.ArticlePubMed
  • 24. Hu RF, Jiang XY, Chen J, Zeng Z, Chen XY, Li Y, et al. Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD008808. ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 25. Mukherjee S, Patel SR, Kales SN, Ayas NT, Strohl KP, Gozal D, et al. An Official American Thoracic Society Statement: the importance of healthy sleep. Recommendations and future priorities. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:1450-8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 26. Ding Q, Redeker NS, Pisani MA, Yaggi HK, Knauert MP. Factors influencing patients' sleep in the intensive care unit: perceptions of patients and clinical staff. Am J Crit Care 2017;26:278-86.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 27. Knauert MP, Haspel JA, Pisani MA. Sleep loss and circadian rhythm disruption in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med 2015;36:419-29.ArticlePubMed
  • 28. Cabello B, Thille AW, Drouot X, Galia F, Mancebo J, d'Ortho MP, et al. Sleep quality in mechanically ventilated patients: comparison of three ventilatory modes. Crit Care Med 2008;36:1749-55.ArticlePubMed
  • 29. Cooper AB, Thornley KS, Young GB, Slutsky AS, Stewart TE, Hanly PJ. Sleep in critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Chest 2000;117:809-18.ArticlePubMed
  • 30. Freedman NS, Gazendam J, Levan L, Pack AI, Schwab RJ. Abnormal sleep/wake cycles and the effect of environmental noise on sleep disruption in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:451-7.ArticlePubMed
  • 31. Gabor JY, Cooper AB, Crombach SA, Lee B, Kadikar N, Bettger HE, et al. Contribution of the intensive care unit environment to sleep disruption in mechanically ventilated patients and healthy subjects. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:708-15.ArticlePubMed
  • 32. Parthasarathy S, Tobin MJ. Effect of ventilator mode on sleep quality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:1423-9.ArticlePubMed
  • 33. Thille AW, Reynaud F, Marie D, Barrau S, Rousseau L, Rault C, et al. Impact of sleep alterations on weaning duration in mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective study. Eur Respir J 2018;51:1702465. ArticlePubMed
  • 34. Delaney LJ, Van Haren F, Lopez V. Sleeping on a problem: the impact of sleep disturbance on intensive care patients. A clinical review. Ann Intensive Care 2015;5:3. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 35. Mistraletti G, Carloni E, Cigada M, Zambrelli E, Taverna M, Sabbatini G, et al. Sleep and delirium in the intensive care unit. Minerva Anestesiol 2008;74:329-33.PubMed
  • 36. Pisani MA, Friese RS, Gehlbach BK, Schwab RJ, Weinhouse GL, Jones SF. Sleep in the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:731-8.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 37. Bernat Adell MD, Galarza Barrachina L, Bisbal Andrés E, Cebrián Graullera G, Pagés Aznar G, Morán Marmaneu MÁ, et al. Factors affecting sleep quality in intensive care units. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed) 2021;45:470-6.ArticlePubMed
  • 38. Lewis SR, Schofield-Robinson OJ, Alderson P, Smith AF. Propofol for the promotion of sleep in adults in the intensive care unit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;1:CD012454. ArticlePubMed
  • 39. Warlan H, Howland L. Posttraumatic stress syndrome associated with stays in the intensive care unit: importance of nurses' involvement. Crit Care Nurse 2015;35:44-54.ArticlePDF
  • 40. Chen Y, Kartsonaki C, Clarke R, Guo Y, Yu C, Bian Z, et al. Characteristics and correlates of sleep duration, daytime napping, snoring and insomnia symptoms among 0.5 million Chinese men and women. Sleep Med 2018;44:67-75.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 41. Almeida OP, Draper B, Pirkis J, Snowdon J, Lautenschlager NT, Byrne G, et al. Anxiety, depression, and comorbid anxiety and depression: risk factors and outcome over two years. Int Psychogeriatr 2012;24:1622-32.ArticlePubMed
  • 42. Shi L, Lu ZA, Que JY, Huang XL, Liu L, Ran MS, et al. Prevalence of and risk factors associated with mental health symptoms among the general population in China during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e2014053.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 43. Scholten AC, Haagsma JA, Cnossen MC, Olff M, van Beeck EF, Polinder S. Prevalence of and risk factors for anxiety and depressive disorders after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. J Neurotrauma 2016;33:1969-94.ArticlePubMed
  • 44. Caruso R, Nanni MG, Riba M, Sabato S, Mitchell AJ, Croce E, et al. Depressive spectrum disorders in cancer: prevalence, risk factors and screening for depression. A critical review. Acta Oncol 2017;56:146-55.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 45. Wen S, Xiao H, Yang Y. The risk factors for depression in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 2019;27:57-67.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 46. Cohen BE, Edmondson D, Kronish IM. State of the art review: depression, stress, anxiety, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Hypertens 2015;28:1295-302.ArticlePubMedPMC
  • 47. Ossola P, Paglia F, Pelosi A, De Panfilis C, Conte G, Tonna M, et al. Risk factors for incident depression in patients at first acute coronary syndrome. Psychiatry Res 2015;228:448-53.ArticlePubMed
  • 48. Pogosova N, Kotseva K, De Bacquer D, von Känel R, De Smedt D, Bruthans J, et al. Psychosocial risk factors in relation to other cardiovascular risk factors in coronary heart disease: results from the EUROASPIRE IV survey. A registry from the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017;24:1371-80.ArticlePubMedPDF
  • 49. Martini J, Petzoldt J, Einsle F, Beesdo-Baum K, Höfler M, Wittchen HU. Risk factors and course patterns of anxiety and depressive disorders during pregnancy and after delivery: a prospective-longitudinal study. J Affect Disord 2015;175:385-95.ArticlePubMed
  • 50. Shakeel N, Eberhard-Gran M, Sletner L, Slinning K, Martinsen EW, Holme I, et al. A prospective cohort study of depression in pregnancy, prevalence and risk factors in a multi-ethnic population. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2015;15:5. ArticlePubMedPMCPDF
  • 51. Johansen SL, Stenhaug BA, Robakis TK, Williams KE, Cullen MR. Past psychiatric conditions as risk factors for postpartum depression: a nationwide cohort study. J Clin Psychiatry 2020;81:19m12929. PubMed
  • 52. Carrier J, Semba K, Deurveilher S, Drogos L, Cyr-Cronier J, Lord C, et al. Sex differences in age-related changes in the sleep-wake cycle. Front Neuroendocrinol 2017;47:66-85.ArticlePubMed
  • 53. Bixler EO, Papaliaga MN, Vgontzas AN, Lin HM, Pejovic S, Karataraki M, et al. Women sleep objectively better than men and the sleep of young women is more resilient to external stressors: effects of age and menopause. J Sleep Res 2009;18:221-8.ArticlePubMedPMC

Figure & Data

References

    Citations

    Citations to this article as recorded by  

      • PubReader PubReader
      • ePub LinkePub Link
      • Cite
        CITE
        export Copy
        Close
        Download Citation
        Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

        Format:
        • RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
        • BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software
        Include:
        • Citation for the content below
        Sleep, anxiety, depression, and stress in critically ill patients: a descriptive study in a Portuguese intensive care unit
        Acute Crit Care. 2024;39(2):312-320.   Published online May 30, 2024
        Close
      • XML DownloadXML Download
      Related articles

      ACC : Acute and Critical Care