Changes in the Characteristics and Long-term Mortality Rates of Intensive Care Unit Patients from 2003 to 2010: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study Performed in the Republic of Korea

Article information

Acute Crit Care. 2018;33(3):135-145
Publication date (electronic) : 2018 August 31
doi : https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2018.00164
1Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea
2Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
3Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
4Department of Statistics, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea
5Department of Neurology, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
Corresponding author Seung-Joon Lee Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, 1 Gangwondaehak-gil, Chuncheon 24341, Korea Tel: +82-33-258-9365 Fax: +82-33-255-6567 E-mail: medfman@gmail.com
Received 2018 May 3; Revised 2018 July 24; Accepted 2018 August 21.

Abstract

Background

There are few studies on intensive care unit (ICU) patients in the Republic of Korea. We analyzed the characteristics and mortality changes of all ICU patients over the last 8 years.

Methods

This study used the cohort of the National Health Insurance Corporation, which provides medical care to all residents of the Republic of Korea. The cohort consists of patients aged 20 years or older between 2003 and 2010 with a history of ICU admission. We analyzed changes in sex, age, household income, number of hospital beds, emergency admissions, and reasons for admission using the Cochran–Armitage trend test. The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of mortality according to these variables and year of admission were calculated by Cox proportional hazards regression.

Results

The proportion of patients aged ≥70 years increased over that period, as did their average age (by 3.6 years). During the 8-year study period, the 3-year mortality rate was 32.91%–35.83%. The overall mortality was higher in males and older patients, in those with a lower household income and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, those admitted to a hospital with a smaller number of beds, and those admitted via the emergency room. There was no significant change in crude mortality rate over the 8-year study period; however, the adjusted HR showed a decreasing trend.

Conclusions

Patients admitted to the ICU were older and had higher CCI score. Nevertheless, there was a temporal trend toward a decrease in the HR of long-term mortality.

INTRODUCTION

Over the past several decades, developments in medicine and increasing age of the population have led to many changes in the characteristics and mortality rates of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [1]. The Korean population is aging rapidly, and the average life expectancy of Korean women born in 2030 is predicted to exceed 90 years [2]. These changes are likely to bring about further rapid aging and changes in the characteristics of patients admitted in ICUs in the Republic of Korea. In ICUs, treatment is highly intensive; consequently, the costs and mortality rates are also high [3,4]. The rates of ICU use are increasing; thus, the costs are also growing [5-7]. Therefore, there has been continuous interest in the consequences of changes in characteristics and mortality rates of ICU patients.

It is difficult to evaluate nationwide changes in ICU admissions due to variations in factors such as hospital volume and location and number of beds. A National Health Insurance Cohort sample has been established in the Republic of Korea comprising approximately 1 million people (2.2% of the total population), which can be considered representative of the general population [8]. Data from large cohorts on the characteristics and mortality rates of ICU admissions are available and is important for predicting changes in such characteristics [9,10].

This study used a nationwide cohort study, the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), to analyze the changes in characteristics of ICU patients and changes in mortality rate according to the factors of interest over the past 8 years. These data will be important to prepare for future trends in critical care needs in the ICU.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cohort and Patients

Korea has a single-payer national health system. The Korean National Health Insurance covers approximately 97% of the population in the Republic of Korea. We used the South Korean NHIS-NSC, which is a population-based cohort. A representative sample of about 1 million people, comprising 2.2% of the entire Korean population of 2002, was selected using systematic stratified random sampling, with proportional allocation to each stratum. All patients were followed up to 2013, unless they died or left the country. Loss of subjects due to death or emigration was compensated for by adding newborn data annually. Thus, the size of the cohort was maintained at 1 million up to 2013. The data include eligibility and demographic information, as well as medical treatments, prescriptions, and general health examination results [8].

Patients and Study Design

From the NHIS-NSC database containing data on 1,097,321 subscribers for the period of 2002–2010, the study population consisted of all patients >20 years old admitted to an ICU of a hospital with more than 300 beds and who were covered by the Korean National Health System between January 1, 2003 and December 31, 2010. In order to calculate 3-year mortality, subscribers of the NHIS-NSC between 2011 and 2013 were excluded. For calculation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), patients admitted to the ICU in 2002 were excluded (n=1,888). The final number of ICU patients of interest during the study period was 25,400 (Figure 1). Factors of interest were sex, age, household income, CCI, hospital size, and reasons for admission, which have been studied in other ICU studies [11-14]. Household income in the NHIS-NCS was classified into deciles; in a further analysis, household income was divided into tertiles (low, deciles 0–4; middle, deciles 5–8; high, deciles 9–10). CCI was calculated according to main diagnosis and sub-diagnosis code during 1 year before the first day of ICU fee request according to the Korean Standard Classification of Diseases (KCD) codes of 17 diseases (Supplementary Table 1) [15]. Hospitals with ICUs were categorized into size tertiles (i.e., according to number of beds: 300–499, 500–803, >803). Reasons for admission were classified into eight categories according to KCD-6 (Supplementary Table 2), a modified version of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision. The study was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board of Kangwon National University Hospital (IRB No. KNUH-2018-01-001).

Figure 1.

Flow chart of the study selection process. NHIS-NSC: National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort; ICU: intensive care unit.

Statistical Analysis

The basic characteristics of the patients in this study were summarized as percentages and proportions, and the linear trends of the proportions of each category were tested by simple linear regressions. The crude mortality rate was calculated as the percentage of deaths of ICU patients admitted in each year for different follow-up periods since the first ICU admission, and the linear trends were examined using the Cochran-Armitage trend test. The chi-square test was performed for 90-day, 1-year, and 3-year mortality rates for each factor to compare differences in mortality according to factors. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) according to admission year to the ICU to determine whether the mortality of ICU patients showed an increasing or decreasing trend over years after adjusting for risk factors of interest. Patients who were alive or had dropped out by the end of the 3-year follow-up period were right-censored. Forest plots were constructed using adjusted HRs and their 95% confidence intervals in Cox models and stratified Cox models by admission reason. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

RESULTS

Temporal Trends in Patient Characteristics

During the 8-year period from 2003 to 2010, the number of applicable ICU admissions in Korea was 25,400. The proportion of males was higher than females in every year, by 9% to 20%. The proportion of patients aged ≥70 years increased over the study period, as did the average age (by 3.6 years). According to household income data, the proportion of patients from middle class households admitted to the ICU decreased over the study period. The proportion of patients with CCI ≥2 increased, as did the proportion of patients admitted to the ICU via the emergency room. The proportion of patients admitted with trauma and poisoning increased over the study period, while the proportions of those admitted with gastrointestinal and liver diseases and with endocrinological diseases including diabetes decreased. However, there were no changes in the proportions of ICU admissions due to infectious diseases, cardiovascular diseases, respiratory diseases, or cancer over the study period (Table 1, Supplementary Table 3).

Basic characteristics of patients admitted to the ICU from 2003 to 2010

Hazard Ratio of Mortality

During the 8-year study period, the 90-day mortality rate was 16.71%–18.93%, the 1-year mortality rate was 24.48%–26.54%, and the 3-year mortality rate was 32.91%–35.83% (Table 2). The 3-year mortality rate was higher in males, older subjects, those with a lower household income and higher CCI score, those admitted to a hospital with a smaller number of beds, and those admitted via the emergency room. Regarding the reasons for admission, mortality rate were higher in cases of infectious disease, cancer, and respiratory disease (Table 3). There was no significant difference among 90-day, 1-year mortality, and 3-year mortality. Significant risk factors for mortality within 3 years after ICU admission were male sex (adjusted HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.30), age ≥80 years (adjusted HR, 7.35; 95% CI, 5.84 to 9.25), lower household income (adjusted HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.27), CCI ≥3 (adjusted HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.98 to 2.36), admitted to a hospital with a small number of beds (adjusted HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.33), admission via the emergency room (adjusted HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.49 to 1.63), respiratory disease (adjusted HR, 2.56; 95% CI, 2.17 to 3.01), cancer (adjusted HR, 2.68; 95% CI, 2.29 to 3.13), and infectious disease (adjusted HR, 2.96; 95% CI, 2.49 to 3.52) (Table 4, Figure 2). These findings showed no difference in 90-day and 1-year mortality analyses except that adjusted HRs were higher for sex, age, and CCI as the duration after ICU admission increased.

Annual mortality rate in the follow-up period at each admission year

The crude mortality rates in the follow-up period according to each variable

The adjusted hazard ratios of mortality by Cox proportional hazards regression

Figure 2.

Forest plot of adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval in Cox models adjusted for sex, age, household income, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of hospital beds, admission via the emergency room, and admission reason.

Temporal Trend of Mortality

During the 8-year study period, the 3-year mortality rate was 32.91%–35.83%, and there was no significant temporal trend (Table 2); however, adjusted HRs showed a decrease. Compared with 2003, the HR has continued to decline significantly since 2007, achieving a value of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76 to 0.90) in 2010 (Table 4). In an analysis stratified according to reason for ICU admission, only cardiovascular disease showed a decreasing trend from 2003 onward, with the lowest HR being 0.66 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.77) in 2010. There was no decrease in HR for any other disease, including cancer and respiratory disease (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of mortality and forest plots of HRs adjusted for sex, age, household income, Charlson comorbidity index, number of hospital beds, and admission via the emergency room in stratified Cox models by admission reason.

DISCUSSION

By reference to the data of a nationwide population-based cohort study, we examined changes in the characteristics and long-term survival rates of patients admitted to an ICU between 2003 and 2010. Patient age, CCI, rate of admission via the emergency room, and rate of admission to hospitals with a small number of beds all increased over the study period. There was a decreasing temporal trend in the HR of long-term mortality because of a reduction in mortality associated with cardiovascular disease.

An increase in average age of patients admitted to an ICU has been reported in several studies performed in developed countries [16]. In our study, the proportion of patients ≥70 years old increased over the study period, and the average age increased (by 3.6 years). In the future in the Republic of Korea, which is expected to have the most aged society in the world by 2030, patients admitted to the ICU are more likely to be of advanced age, and the proportion of patients ≥80 years old is likely to increase [2]. Therefore, it is necessary to prepare for the aging of patients admitted to the ICU. In particular, patients ≥80 years old showed a prominent increase in mortality rate in this study. This is an important result confirmed by the national cohort data. We should consider once more whether ICU admission is helpful for long-term survival in old age. Discussion about advance directives and patient’s decisions on life-sustaining treatment are increasingly necessary.

Differences in the proportions of ICU admissions by household income level were not marked. But, the adjusted risk of mortality was 1.2-fold higher in the lowest tertile versus the highest tertile. These findings agree with those of previous studies [13,17,18]. The adjusted HR of mortality at 90 days, 1-year, and 3-years was 1.2 (Table 4). It is important that both short-term and long-term care is affected by household income level with regard to mortality rate. This result implies that the physician needs to consider household income in treating critical illness and may consider a policy to reduce this difference.

The CCI has increased in patients admitted to the ICU. The HR of long-term mortality was also higher with a higher CCI. A number of physiological illness severity scoring systems have been developed in observational studies of ICU outcomes, such as the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) [19], the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) [20], and the Mortality Probability Model (MPM) [21]. However, the complexity and time constraints associated with these scoring systems limit their use in large population-based databases. Comorbidity has been shown to be an important determinant of ICU outcome [22,23]. Considering CCI in the patients admitted to an ICU will be helpful for predicting the long-term survival rate. In future study of ICU admission in association with mortality, it is better to accumulate evidence using CCI as well as a physiological illness severity scoring system.

We analyzed the data of hospitals with at least 300 beds; in these large hospitals, there was no significant change in the number of patients admitted to the ICU over the study period. The long-term mortality rate of ICU patients was significantly lower in larger versus smaller hospitals (31.15% vs. 39.88, respectively). Compared with large hospitals, the adjusted HR of long-term mortality in small hospitals was 1.25 (95% CI, 1.18 to 1.33). Additional analysis was performed on the characteristics of the patients according to number of hospital beds. For males, those with higher income and a CCI of 3 or greater tended to be admitted to large hospitals (Supplementary Table 4). It is important to understand the differences in the characteristics of large hospitals and small hospitals for preparation in future ICUs to prevent unbalanced inflow to large hospitals.

In our study, the mortality rate was highest for respiratory diseases and lowest for trauma and poisoning. There was no significant change in the crude HR of mortality over the study period; however, there was a significant difference in the adjusted HR. When analyzing admission reasons, there were no temporal trends toward a reduction in mortality, except for that due to cardiovascular disease. The HR of cardiovascular disease continued to decline from 2003. The reduction in mortality rate of the overall patient population was attributed to a decrease in mortality of patients hospitalized for cardiovascular disease. To our knowledge, there have been no previous reports on temporal trends in mortality by disease type among all patients admitted to ICUs in the Republic of Korea. There are many possible reasons for the reduction in mortality rate of cardiovascular disease, such as development of superior interventions, increased awareness of acute myocardial infarction among doctors and the general public, and improved care in coronary care units in recent decades [24]. We need to build a systematic database of diseases that have not shown improved survival rates over the past years, analyze the causes, and make improvements.

Our study had some limitations. First, we did not include widely used scoring systems. Second, the reason for ICU admission was based on the main diagnosis at admission, which may not always have corresponded to the actual reason for hospitalization. Despite these limitations, this study is important because it is first to analyze the characteristics and mortality rates of Korean ICU patients based on a nationally representative cohort.

From 2003 to 2010, the number of ICU admissions in the Republic of Korea increased, as did the age and disease severity of the patients. Meanwhile, the HR of long-term mortality gradually declined; in an analysis according to main diagnosis, this seemed to be due to the reduction in mortality rate of cardiovascular disease. Our research will be important in understanding the epidemiology of Korean ICU admission and preparing for change.

KEY MESSAGES

▪ From 2003 to 2010, patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in the Republic of Korea were older and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores.

▪ The ICU mortality was higher in males, elderly, those with a lower household income and higher CCI score.

▪ From 2003 to 2010, there was a temporal trend toward a decrease in the hazard ratio of long-term mortality in ICU admissions.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by 2015 Research Grant from Kangwon National University (No. 520150347). This study used National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort data (NHIS-2018-2-112), made by National Health Insurance Service.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

References

1. Bagshaw SM, Webb SA, Delaney A, George C, Pilcher D, Hart GK, et al. Very old patients admitted to intensive care in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre cohort analysis. Crit Care 2009;13:R45.
2. Kontis V, Bennett JE, Mathers CD, Li G, Foreman K, Ezzati M. Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble. Lancet 2017;389:1323–35.
3. Milbrandt EB, Kersten A, Rahim MT, Dremsizov TT, Clermont G, Cooper LM, et al. Growth of intensive care unit resource use and its estimated cost in Medicare. Crit Care Med 2008;36:2504–10.
4. Molina JA, Seow E, Heng BH, Chong WF, Ho B. Outcomes of direct and indirect medical intensive care unit admissions from the emergency department of an acute care hospital: a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e005553.
5. Halpern NA, Pastores SM. Critical care medicine in the United States 2000-2005: an analysis of bed numbers, occupancy rates, payer mix, and costs. Crit Care Med 2010;38:65–71.
6. Halpern NA, Pastores SM, Greenstein RJ. Critical care medicine in the United States 1985-2000: an analysis of bed numbers, use, and costs. Crit Care Med 2004;32:1254–9.
7. Wallace DJ, Angus DC, Seymour CW, Barnato AE, Kahn JM. Critical care bed growth in the United States: a comparison of regional and national trends. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:410–6.
8. Lee J, Lee JS, Park SH, Shin SA, Kim K. Cohort profile: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHISNSC), South Korea. Int J Epidemiol 2017;46:e15.
9. Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000-2012. JAMA 2014;311:1308–16.
10. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, Knaus WA. Changes in hospital mortality for United States intensive care unit admissions from 1988 to 2012. Crit Care 2013;17:R81.
11. Mahmood K, Eldeirawi K, Wahidi MM. Association of gender with outcomes in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2012;16:R92.
12. Fuchs L, Chronaki CE, Park S, Novack V, Baumfeld Y, Scott D, et al. ICU admission characteristics and mortality rates among elderly and very elderly patients. Intensive Care Med 2012;38:1654–61.
13. Schnegelsberg A, Mackenhauer J, Nibro HL, Dreyer P, Koch K, Kirkegaard H. Impact of socioeconomic status on mortality and unplanned readmission in septic intensive care unit patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60:465–75.
14. Christensen S, Johansen MB, Christiansen CF, Jensen R, Lemeshow S. Comparison of Charlson comorbidity index with SAPS and APACHE scores for prediction of mortality following intensive care. Clin Epidemiol 2011;3:203–11.
15. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373–83.
16. Sjoding MW, Prescott HC, Wunsch H, Iwashyna TJ, Cooke CR. Longitudinal changes in ICU admissions among elderly patients in the United States. Crit Care Med 2016;44:1353–60.
17. Koch K, Nørgaard M, Schønheyder HC, Thomsen RW, Søgaard M, ; Danish Collaborative Bacteremia Network. Effect of socioeconomic status on mortality after bacteremia in workingage patients: a Danish population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2013;8e70082.
18. Hutchings A, Raine R, Brady A, Wildman M, Rowan K. Socioeconomic status and outcome from intensive care in England and Wales. Med Care 2004;42:943–51.
19. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA 1993;270:2957–63.
20. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985;13:818–29.
21. Lemeshow S, Teres D, Klar J, Avrunin JS, Gehlbach SH, Rapoport J. Mortality Probability Models (MPM II) based on an international cohort of intensive care unit patients. JAMA 1993;270:2478–86.
22. Ho KM, Knuiman M, Finn J, Webb SA. Estimating long-term survival of critically ill patients: the PREDICT model. PLoS One 2008;3e3226.
23. Johnston JA, Wagner DP, Timmons S, Welsh D, Tsevat J, Render ML. Impact of different measures of comorbid disease on predicted mortality of intensive care unit patients. Med Care 2002;40:929–40.
24. Jhun HJ, Kim H, Cho SI. Time trend and age-period-cohort effects on acute myocardial infarction mortality in Korean adults from 1988 to 2007. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:637–41.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Flow chart of the study selection process. NHIS-NSC: National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort; ICU: intensive care unit.

Figure 2.

Forest plot of adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval in Cox models adjusted for sex, age, household income, Charlson Comorbidity Index, number of hospital beds, admission via the emergency room, and admission reason.

Figure 3.

The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of mortality and forest plots of HRs adjusted for sex, age, household income, Charlson comorbidity index, number of hospital beds, and admission via the emergency room in stratified Cox models by admission reason.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of patients admitted to the ICU from 2003 to 2010

Variable Total 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 β (P-value)a
Total of ICU admission 25,400 (2.31) 2,938 (0.29) 3,091 (0.30) 2,947 (0.29) 3,089 (0.31) 3,296 (0.32) 3,315 (0.33) 3,412 (0.34) 3,312 (0.33) 0.007 (0.001)
Sex
 Male 14,721 (57.96) 1,607 (54.7) 1,753 (56.71) 1,769 (60.03) 1,805 (58.43) 1,965 (59.62) 1,949 (58.79) 1,952 (57.21) 1,921 (58.00) 0.27 (0.337)
 Female 10,679 (42.04) 1,331 (45.3) 1,338 (43.29) 1,178 (39.97) 1,284 (41.57) 1,331 (40.38) 1,366 (41.21) 1,460 (42.79) 1,391 (42.00) -0.27 (0.337)
Age (yr)
 20-29 787 (3.10) 121 (4.12) 125 (4.04) 87 (2.95) 90 (2.91) 94 (2.85) 112 (3.38) 91 (2.67) 67 (2.02) -0.24 (0.008)
 30-39 1,565 (6.16) 232 (7.90) 254 (8.22) 207 (7.02) 172 (5.57) 191 (5.79) 169 (5.10) 157 (4.60) 183 (5.53) -0.47 (0.003)
 40-49 3,286 (12.94) 421 (14.33) 470 (15.21) 416 (14.12) 383 (12.40) 417 (12.65) 398 (12.01) 408 (11.96) 373 (11.26) -0.52 (0.001)
 50-59 4,607 (18.14) 550 (18.72) 545 (17.63) 507 (17.20) 560 (18.13) 583 (17.69) 617 (18.61) 632 (18.52) 613 (18.51) 0.08 (0.390)
 60-69 6,275 (24.70) 757 (25.77) 795 (25.72) 763 (25.89) 791 (25.61) 795 (24.12) 789 (23.80) 782 (22.92) 803 (24.25) -0.38 (0.009)
 70-79 5,952 (23.43) 605 (20.59) 616 (19.93) 645 (21.89) 728 (23.57) 810 (24.58) 824 (24.86) 902 (26.44) 822 (24.82) 0.85 (0.001)
  ≥80 2,928 (11.53) 252 (8.58) 286 (9.25) 322 (10.93) 365 (11.82) 406 (12.32) 406 (12.25) 440 (12.90) 451 (13.62) 0.69 (0.001)
Age (yr), mean±SD 62.15±15.37 60.02±15.58 59.95±15.76 61.54±15.42 62.59±15.13 62.74±15.32 62.79±15.34 63.53±15.03 63.63±14.92 0.56 (0.001)
Household income
 High 7,740 (30.47) 904 (30.77) 948 (30.67) 852 (28.91) 942 (30.50) 977 (29.64) 999 (30.14) 1,075 (31.51) 1,043 (31.49) 0.14 (0.329)
 Middle 9,674 (38.09) 1,113 (37.88) 1,243 (40.21) 1,139 (38.65) 1,208 (39.11) 1,272 (38.59) 1,256 (37.89) 1,237 (36.25) 1,206 (36.41) -0.39 (0.043)
 Low 7,986 (31.44) 921 (31.35) 900 (29.12) 956 (32.44) 939 (30.40) 1,047 (31.77) 1,060 (31.98) 1,100 (32.24) 1,063 (32.10) 0.24 (0.169)
CCI
 0 3,961 (15.59) 550 (18.72) 593 (19.18) 462 (15.68) 454 (14.70) 474 (14.38) 480 (14.48) 483 (14.16) 465 (14.04) -0.73 (0.005)
 1 6,901 (27.17) 802 (27.30) 924 (29.89) 855 (29.01) 864 (27.97) 880 (26.70) 880 (26.55) 870 (25.50) 826 (24.94) -0.56 (0.013)
 2 4,934 (19.43) 545 (18.55) 535 (17.31) 563 (19.10) 603 (19.52) 691 (20.96) 634 (19.13) 676 (19.81) 687 (20.74) 0.34 (0.040)
 ≥3 9,604 (37.81) 1,041 (35.43) 1,039 (33.61) 1,067 (36.21) 1,168 (37.81) 1,251 (37.96) 1,321 (39.85) 1,383 (40.53) 1,334 (40.28) 0.95 (0.001)
Comorbidity
Myocardial infarction 1,825 (7.19) 212 (7.22) 220 (7.12) 218 (7.40) 267 (8.64) 241 (7.31) 247 (7.45) 221 (6.48) 199 (6.01) -0.15 (0.226)
 Congestive heart failure 860 (3.39) 128 (4.36) 94 (3.04) 102 (3.46) 121 (3.92) 114 (3.46) 98 (2.96) 106 (3.11) 97 (2.93) -0.13 (0.072)
 Peripheral vascular 449 (1.77) 53 (1.80) 58 (1.88) 58 (1.97) 46 (1.49) 67 (2.03) 53 (1.60) 67 (1.96) 47 (1.42) 0.03 (0.393)
 Cerebrovascular 4,349 (17.12) 489 (16.64) 513 (16.6) 567 (19.24) 529 (17.13) 553 (16.78) 540 (16.29) 544 (15.94) 614 (18.54) 0.01 (0.961)
 Dementia 90 (0.35) 4 (0.14) 0 5 (0.17) 18 (0.58) 13 (0.39) 8 (0.24) 23 (0.67) 19 (0.57) 0.07 (0.027)
 Chronic pulmonary 919 (3.62) 109 (3.71) 123 (3.98) 103 (3.50) 117 (3.79) 140 (4.25) 111 (3.35) 111 (3.25) 105 (3.17) -0.08 (0.135)
 Rheumatology 45 (0.18) 5 (0.17) 12 (0.39) 3 (0.10) 5 (0.16) 3 (0.09) 7 (0.21) 5 (0.15) 5 (0.15) -0.01 (0.416)
 Peptic ulcer 835 (3.29) 112 (3.81) 103 (3.33) 104 (3.53) 106 (3.43) 94 (2.85) 124 (3.74) 103 (3.02) 89 (2.69) -0.11 (0.072)
 Mild liver 972 (3.83) 136 (4.63) 125 (4.04) 124 (4.21) 113 (3.66) 124 (3.76) 134 (4.04) 107 (3.14) 109 (3.29) -0.17 (0.007)
 Diabetes without chronic complications 909 (3.58) 78 (2.65) 75 (2.43) 78 (2.65) 79 (2.56) 155 (4.70) 143 (4.31) 145 (4.25) 156 (4.71) 0.36 (0.001)
 Diabetes with chronic complications 352 (1.39) 42 (1.43) 36 (1.16) 37 (1.26) 47 (1.52) 60 (1.82) 53 (1.60) 45 (1.32) 32 (0.97) -0.01 (0.776)
 Hemiplegia or paraplegia 344 (1.35) 36 (1.23) 41 (1.33) 37 (1.26) 55 (1.78) 45 (1.37) 48 (1.45) 34 (1.00) 48 (1.45) 0.00 (0.987)
 Renal 490 (1.93) 65 (2.21) 55 (1.78) 55 (1.87) 58 (1.88) 57 (1.73) 77 (2.32) 65 (1.91) 58 (1.75) -0.01 (0.663)
 Any malignancy, including leukemia and lymphoma 3,803 (14.97) 453 (15.42) 461 (14.91) 402 (13.64) 473 (15.31) 475 (14.41) 484 (14.60) 537 (15.74) 518 (15.64) 0.09 (0.450)
 Moderate or severe liver 434 (1.71) 67 (2.28) 63 (2.04) 53 (1.80) 47 (1.52) 48 (1.46) 53 (1.60) 50 (1.47) 53 (1.60) -0.09 (0.014)
 Metastasis solid tumor 938 (3.69) 149 (5.07) 125 (4.04) 105 (3.56) 111 (3.59) 127 (3.85) 96 (2.90) 118 (3.46) 107 (3.23) -0.20 (0.021)
 AIDS/HIV 7 (0.03) 0 1 (0.03) 1 (0.03) 1 (0.03) 1 (0.03) 0 2 (0.06) 1 (0.03) 0.003 (0.313)
Hospital bed
 >803 14,777 (58.18) 1,883 (64.09) 2,012 (65.09) 1,683 (57.11) 1,811 (58.63) 1,807 (54.82) 1,821 (54.93) 1,930 (56.57) 1,830 (55.25) -1.36 (0.012)
 500-803 7,223 (28.44) 752 (25.60) 761 (24.62) 835 (28.33) 867 (28.07) 1,013 (30.73) 1,003 (30.26) 986 (28.90) 1,006 (30.37) 0.75 (0.012)
 300-499 3,400 (13.39) 303 (10.31) 318 (10.29) 429 (14.56) 411 (13.31) 476 (14.44) 491 (14.81) 496 (14.54) 476 (14.37) 0.61 (0.021)
Emergency admission
 Emergency room 13,466 (53.02) 1,329 (45.23) 1,354 (43.80) 1,603 (54.39) 1,684 (54.52) 1,838 (55.76) 1,871 (56.44) 1,921 (56.30) 1,866 (56.34) 1.75 (0.011)
 Others 11,934 (46.98) 1,609 (54.77) 1,737 (56.20) 1,344 (45.61) 1,405 (45.48) 1,458 (44.24) 1,444 (43.56) 1,491 (43.70) 1,446 (43.66) -1.75 (0.011)
Admission reason
 Cardiovascular 10,820 (42.60) 1,182 (40.23) 1,268 (41.02) 1,292 (43.84) 1,371 (44.38) 1,413 (42.87) 1,409 (42.50) 1,449 (42.47) 1,436 (43.36) 0.28 (0.211)
 Cancer 4,608 (18.14) 548 (18.65) 540 (17.47) 482 (16.36) 568 (18.39) 581 (17.63) 594 (17.92) 656 (19.23) 639 (19.29) 0.20 (0.196)
 Trauma/poisoning 2,736 (10.77) 289 (9.84) 277 (8.96) 324 (10.99) 317 (10.26) 394 (11.95) 384 (11.58) 372 (10.90) 379 (11.44) 0.29 (0.047)
 Gastrointestinal/liver 2,656 (10.46) 351 (11.95) 376 (12.16) 317 (10.76) 332 (10.75) 323 (9.80) 345 (10.41) 320 (9.38) 292 (8.82) -0.45 (0.001)
 Respiratory 1,807 (7.11) 193 (6.57) 235 (7.60) 208 (7.06) 218 (7.06) 268 (8.13) 222 (6.70) 253 (7.42) 210 (6.34) -0.03 (0.768)
 Infectious 1,039 (4.09) 126 (4.29) 131 (4.24) 136 (4.61) 106 (3.43) 110 (3.34) 141 (4.25) 148 (4.34) 141 (4.26) -0.01 (0.894)
 Endocrinology 616 (2.43) 91 (3.10) 90 (2.91) 67 (2.27) 66 (2.14) 82 (2.49) 77 (2.32) 77 (2.26) 66 (1.99) -0.12 (0.016)
 Others 1,118 (4.40) 158 (5.38) 174 (5.63) 121 (4.11) 111 (3.59) 125 (3.79) 143 (4.31) 137 (4.02) 149 (4.50) -0.15 (0.172)

Values are presented as the number of ICU patients (%) unless otherwise indicated.

ICU: intensive care unit; SD: standard deviation; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; AIDS/HIV: acquired immune deficiency syndrome and human immunodeficiency virus infection.

a

β: the slope parameter estimate of a simple linear regression of the proportion of each category on year; the P-value for the hypothesis β=0.

Table 2.

Annual mortality rate in the follow-up period at each admission year

Admission year Mortality (%)
90-Day 1-Year 3-Year
2003 491 (16.71) 726 (24.71) 971 (33.05)
2004 547 (17.70) 767 (24.81) 1,038 (33.58)
2005 558 (18.93) 782 (26.54) 1,056 (35.83)
2006 555 (17.97) 798 (25.83) 1,073 (34.74)
2007 555 (16.84) 807 (24.48) 1,090 (33.07)
2008 604 (18.22) 838 (25.28) 1,127 (34.00)
2009 613 (17.97) 837 (24.53) 1,123 (32.91)
2010 617 (18.63) 818 (24.70) 1,093 (33.00)
P-valuea 0.098 0.245 0.149

Values are presented as number (%).

a

Cochran-Armitage trend tests.

Table 3.

The crude mortality rates in the follow-up period according to each variable

Variable Mortality (%)
90-Day P-valuea 1-Year P-valuea 3-Year P-valuea
Total 4,540 (17.87) 6,373 (25.09) 8,571 (33.74)
Sex 0.2226 0.0027 0.0001
 Male 2,668 (18.12) 3,796 (25.79) 5,137 (34.90)
 Female 1,872 (17.53) 2,577 (24.13) 3,434 (32.16)
Age (yr) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
 20-29 52 (6.61) 62 (7.88) 78 (9.91)
 30-39 150 (9.58) 187 (11.95) 238 (15.21)
 40-49 379 (11.53) 485 (14.76) 637 (19.39)
 50-59 589 (12.78) 790 (17.15) 1,075 (23.33)
 60-69 926 (14.76) 1,381 (22.01) 1,923 (30.65)
 70-79 1,385 (23.27) 1,983 (33.32) 2,690 (45.19)
 ≥80 1,059 (36.17) 1,485 (50.72) 1,930 (65.92)
Household income 0.0022 0.0001 0.0001
 High 1,407 (18.18) 2,002 (25.87) 2,689 (34.74)
 Middle 1,630 (16.85) 2,272 (23.49) 3,105 (32.10)
 Low 1,503 (18.82) 2,099 (26.28) 2,777 (34.77)
CCI 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
 0 440 (11.11) 550 (13.89) 692 (17.47)
 1 992 (14.37) 1,359 (19.69) 1,780 (25.79)
 2 817 (16.56) 1,128 (22.86) 1,575 (31.92)
 ≥3 2,291 (23.85) 3,336 (34.74) 4,524 (47.11)
Hospital bed 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
 >803 2,385 (16.14) 3,371 (22.81) 4,603 (31.15)
 500-803 1,410 (19.52) 1,950 (27.00) 2,612 (36.16)
 300-499 745 (21.91) 1,052 (30.94) 1,356 (39.88)
Emergency admission 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
 Emergency room 2,893 (21.48) 3,959 (29.40) 5,110 (37.95)
 Others 1,647 (13.80) 2,414 (20.23) 3,461 (29.00)
Admission reason 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001
 Respiratory 616 (34.09) 812 (44.94) 1,007 (55.73)
 Infectious 378 (36.38) 451 (43.41) 505 (48.60)
 Cancer 1,084 (23.52) 1,631 (35.39) 2,261 (49.07)
 Endocrinology 90 (14.61) 145 (23.54) 218 (35.39)
 Gastrointestinal/liver 380 (14.31) 524 (19.73) 755 (28.43)
 Cardiovascular 1,542 (14.25) 2,197 (20.30) 2,973 (27.48)
 Trauma/poisoning 363 (13.27) 491 (17.95) 680 (24.85)
 Others 87 (7.78) 122 (10.91) 172 (15.38)

Values are presented as number (%).

CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index.

a

Chi-square test.

Table 4.

The adjusted hazard ratios of mortality by Cox proportional hazards regression

Variable Adjusteda HR (95% CI)
90-Day mortality 1-Year mortality 3-Year mortality
Admission year
 2003 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 2004 1.07 (0.95-1.21) 1.02 (0.92-1.13) 1.04 (0.95-1.14)
 2005 1.04 (0.92-1.17) 0.99 (0.89-1.09) 1.01 (0.93-1.10)
 2006 0.95 (0.84-1.07) 0.92 (0.83-1.01) 0.93 (0.85-1.01)
 2007 0.85 (0.76-0.96) 0.83 (0.75-0.92) 0.83 (0.76-0.91)
 2008 0.94 (0.83-1.05) 0.87 (0.79-0.96) 0.88 (0.80-0.95)
 2009 0.88 (0.78-0.99) 0.80 (0.72-0.88) 0.79 (0.73-0.86)
 2010 0.94 (0.83-1.06) 0.83 (0.75-0.92) 0.82 (0.76-0.90)
Sex
 Female 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Male 1.14 (1.07-1.21) 1.20 (1.14-1.26) 1.24 (1.19-1.30)
Age (yr)
 20-29 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 30-39 1.40 (1.02-1.92) 1.45 (1.09-1.94) 1.47 (1.13-1.89)
 40-49 1.59 (1.18-2.12) 1.66 (1.27-2.16) 1.71 (1.35-2.17)
 50-59 1.65 (1.24-2.20) 1.80 (1.39-2.34) 1.93 (1.53-2.44)
 60-69 1.84 (1.38-2.44) 2.24 (1.73-2.90) 2.51 (2.00-3.16)
 70-79 2.92 (2.20-3.87) 3.58 (2.77-4.63) 4.11 (3.27-5.17)
 ≥80 4.73 (3.56-6.28) 6.13 (4.74-7.94) 7.35 (5.84-9.25)
Household income
 High 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Middle 1.08 (1.01-1.17) 1.07 (1.01-1.14) 1.10 (1.04-1.15)
 Low 1.20 (1.11-1.29) 1.20 (1.13-1.28) 1.20 (1.14-1.27)
CCI
 0 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 1 1.17 (1.04-1.31) 1.24 (1.12-1.37) 1.30 (1.18-1.42)
 2 1.23 (1.09-1.40) 1.30 (1.17-1.44) 1.45 (1.32-1.59)
 ≥3 1.76 (1.58-1.97) 1.96 (1.78-2.16) 2.16 (1.98-2.36)
Hospital bed
 >803 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 500-803 1.17 (1.09-1.25) 1.16 (1.09-1.22) 1.14 (1.09-1.20)
 300-499 1.26 (1.16-1.37) 1.30 (1.21-1.39) 1.25 (1.18-1.33)
Emergency admissi n
 Others 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Emergency room 1.71 (1.60-1.82) 1.67 (1.58-1.76) 1.56 (1.49-1.63)
Admission reason
 Others 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference) 1.00 (Reference)
 Cardiovascular 1.33 (1.07-1.65) 1.32 (1.10-1.58) 1.27 (1.09-1.48)
 Respiratory 2.81 (2.24-3.53) 2.69 (2.22-3.26) 2.56 (2.17-3.01)
 Cancer 2.43 (1.94-3.03) 2.62 (2.17-3.16) 2.68 (2.29-3.13)
 Infectious 3.89 (3.07-4.91) 3.47 (2.84-4.25) 2.96 (2.49-3.52)
 Endocrinology 1.33 (0.99-1.79) 1.50 (1.18-1.91) 1.66 (1.35-2.02)
 Gastrointestinal/liver 1.38 (1.09-1.74) 1.34 (1.10-1.63) 1.39 (1.17-1.64)
 Trauma/poisoning 1.33 (1.05-1.68) 1.28 (1.05-1.56) 1.30 (1.10-1.53)

HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index.

a

Adjusted for sex, age, house hold income, CCI, hospital beds, emergency admission, admission reason.