Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "perioperative period"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Article
Pediatrics
Perioperative hemodynamic protective assessment of adaptive support ventilation usage in pediatric surgical patients
Dmytro Dmytriiev, Mykola Melnychenko, Oleksandr Dobrovanov, Oleksandr Nazarchuk, Marian Vidiscak
Acute Crit Care. 2022;37(4):636-643.   Published online October 19, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/acc.2022.00297
  • 2,537 View
  • 115 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
The aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic protective effects of perioperative ventilation in pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and adaptive support ventilation (ASV) modes based on non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring indicators. Methods: The study included 32 patients who were scheduled for planned open abdominal surgery. Depending on the chosen ventilation strategy, patients were included in two groups of PCV mode ventilation (n=14) and ASV mode ventilation (n=18). The hemodynamic effects of the ventilation strategies were assessed by estimated continuous cardiac output (esCCO) and cardiac index (esCCI). Results: Preoperative cardiac output (CO) was 6.1±1.3 L/min in group 1 patients and 6.3±0.8 L/min in group 2 patients, and preoperative cardiac index (CI) was 3.9±0.4 L/min/m2 in group 1 patients and 3.8±0.8 L/min/m2 in group 2 patients. The ejection fraction (EF) in group 1 subjects was 55.4%±0.3%; this rate was 56.5%±0.5% in group 2 subjects. Group 1 patients experienced a 14.7% CO decrease to 5.2±0.7 L/min, a 17.9% CI decrease to 3.2±0.6 L/min/m2 , and a 12.8% mean arterial pressure decrease to 82.3±9.4 mm Hg 30 minutes after the start of surgery. One hour after the start of surgery, the CO mean values of group 2 patients were lower than baseline by 7.9% and differed from the dynamics of patients in group 1, in whom CO was lower than baseline by 13.1%. At the end of the operation, the CO values were lower than baseline by 11.5% and 6.3% in patients of groups 1 and 2, respectively. Our data showed that the changes in EF during and after surgery correlated with CO indicators determined by the esCCO. Conclusions: In our study, perioperative ventilation in ASV mode was more protective than PCV mode and was characterized by lower tidal volume (16.2%) and driving pressure (12.1%). Hemodynamically-controlled mechanical ventilation reduces the negative impact of cardiopulmonary interactions,

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Trends in the dynamics of morbidity and mortality from hypertension in the Republic of Kazakhstan from 2010 to 2019
    Yeldos Makhambetchin, Aigerim Yessembekova, Ardak Nurbakyttana, Aza Galayeva, Saparkul Arinova
    Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski.2024; 52(1): 95.     CrossRef
  • Clinical evaluation of ventilation mode on acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with respiratory failure
    Jun-Jun Wang, Zhong Zhou, Li-Ying Zhang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(26): 6040.     CrossRef
Case Report
Cardiology
Cardiogenic Shock in a Patient with Intermediate Coronary Artery Disease due to Preoperative Spasm
Donghun Shin, Min Jin Lee, Chul Hong Park, Joongkeun Kim, Dae Sung Lee, Jun Hyok Oh
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2014;29(3):222-225.   Published online August 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2014.29.3.222
  • 3,789 View
  • 50 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
The best management strategy for angiographically intermediated coronary artery diseases remains controversial. Lesions, when coupled with spasm, can lead to catastrophic results and cardiogenic shock. We report a case of a 62-year-old man who had an intermediate coronary artery disease presenting with cardiogenic shock due to coronary spasm during a preoperative period.

ACC : Acute and Critical Care